The fiefdoms – a long way from reliable and fast

steve rubel Steve Rubel was good enough to share with us his experience of using in-flight wifi on his Virgin America flight and how the real-time video chat was usable. Not perfect but passably usable.

His parting shot in the post was how Internet everywhere is finally becoming a reality:

Having the Internet everywhere is finally becoming a reality. We still have a ways to go. It should be like running water or electricity – reliable and fast. But the final cones of disconnectedness are slowly but surely falling.

Well as nice as that might sound I think we are very long way from seeing any kind of broadband that is everywhere like running water or electricity. We are also a long way from it being reliable and fast. It will only be as reliable and fast as the broadband providers want it to be. As long as they control the pipes don’t expect to be everywhere like running water or electricity any time soon.

For the broadband providers those pipes are their personal fiefdoms and they are going to milk them and us for as much as they can, as long as they can, while doing as little as possible to provide us with world class ubiquitous Internet connectivity.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Pay walls – a failed stop gap measure

toll-booth No one can blame the newspaper industry for grasping at whatever straws it can in order to survive. We can’t really be surprised that management heavy organizations are more interested in saving their bonus structures than re-inventing themselves.

As much as the industry tries to get a grip on how the world of news and information distribution is changing they still don’t get it. They try as hard as they possibly can to mold the Web to fit their ideas of how the news business should be run. Almost constantly we are barraged with obviously stupid statements and equally stupid images of vampires and other losers on the Web who is out to destroy the industry.

The panacea to all this horror that the news industry is facing?

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

TechCrunch conference not as important as poker

sacks Or at least it’s not as important as placing at the World Series of Poker and if your name is David Sacks (CEO of Geni/Yammer).

According to Michael Arrington Sacks is scheduled to speak at the Real-Time Stream CrunchUp conference hosted by TechCrunch. Right now however it is day one of the three day poker tournament and David Sacks is up by $91,000. Day three of the tournament falls on the same day as the TechCrunch conference.

Sacks apparently told Arrington that if he was still in the money at the tournament he wouldn’t be able to speak at the conference. This apparently hasn’t made Arrington a very happy camper

The tournament has just started so there isn’t much to report yet. One concern we have – Sacks is set to speak at our real time event this Friday, which is day three of the tournament. He told me today that if he makes it to day three he “has to play,” and won’t make the event. My response? It was NSFW.

Good luck to everyone. Except Sacks. I hope he loses it all on day 2.

Granted Sacks, if he makes it to day three, could have a shot at winning part of the $50 million prizes being awarded but pissing off Arrington in the process? I sure hope Sacks wins enough to offset the slapfest Arrington will probably have if Sacks skips out on the conference.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Posting Redux: Bloggers – Hypocrisy of ethics

While moving to the new domain and new name I’ve been finding posts that I really liked when I first wrote them. So I have decided to repost them as part of a regular Sunday feature for the next little while. At the bottom of the repost I will also update the original post with any new thoughts that I might have had since orginally publishing the selected post; along with any corrections that need to be made.

You say potatoe .. I say potato

Originally posted February 1, 2007

Almost since the first AdSense panel was displayed on a blogger’s page the question of advertising and blogging has been a simmering issue that raises its head every once in awhile. The last time there was a great big blowup in the blogosphere over the ethics of advertising on blogs it was due to the launch of services like PayPerPost and ReviewME.

The battle lines where drawn around three separate camps on the issue. There were the purists who said that advertising of any kind had no place on blogs. We were apparently suppose to spend our time writing and eat the cost of having a site to display those thoughts. We were suppose to be professional without getting any of the benefits of that growing professionalism other than a nice warm and fuzzy feeling.

The second camp recognized that hosting bills and the such couldn’t be paid with warm and fuzzy; and felt there was nothing wrong with accepting sponsorships, sidebar ads and Google AdSense. This way bills got paid and if there was anything left over after that then it was a bonus. Which for some those bonus grew; and continue to grow, into a nice livelihood as it should for a professional.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

A need for a new blog ranking system

rankings_lg We might not want to admit in public but bloggers; especially those doing it as a career, liked having a ranking system that we use to get with Technorati. I say use to because whether they might not want to admit it or not Technorati isn’t really relevant anymore. Still though we flash that Technorati chicklet in our sidebars like it does mean something.

The thing is that between the service being severely gamed into uselessness the whole new media arena, of which blogs are only a part of now, has changed dramatically. Links, the very commodity by which we figured out our worth within the blogosphere have changed. They have grown beyond the blogs and into metric powerhouses on other new media services.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Marketers count on gullibility so you will spam for them

Thumbs Up A big thumbs up to Sarah Perez over at ReadWriteWeb for her excellent post on needing a marketer filter on Twitter. I couldn’t agree more but there’s a couple of things that these marketers, or companies, are doing which is worse than just counting own our gullibility in order to promote their products. After all, as Sarah points out, who wouldn’t want to win a MacBook Pro.

The way they are doing this ‘promotion’ is really just another way to game Twitter, and us, by manipulating what has become an integral part of Twitter – the hashtags. I’ve taken exception before to the abuse of hashtags and how the misuse of them is detrimental to the use of Twitter. By their definition in the Twitter ecosphere hashtags are meant to identify a specific tweet as belonging to a larger conversation on a current ‘hot’ or trending subject.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

All the tools are there for newspapers to save themselves

rabbit-turtle While Michelle Greer might have being saying it with a little tongue in cheek when she suggested that to save themselves newspapers should hire Robert Scoble the point she was trying to make is pretty spot on. The overall point that I get the impression that she was trying to make is that newspapers have all the best tools in the world at their disposal and they have some great people on their payrolls – so why aren’t they using them?

The most current example to their always seeming to come up short was the recent incident in Iran and how it exploded on Twitter and how bloggers like Scoble and Mark “Rizzn” Hopkins almost immediately started putting some really great stuff – blog posts and podcasts. It took the regular news media the better part of two days to really get up to steam on putting out any news about what was happening.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Okay Twitter the ball’s in your court

fitnessalways-cap I don’t follow that many people on Twitter which makes it rather easy to spot out of place tweets as they come through my Twitter client. At first when I started noticing a specific Twitterer showing up in my Friends stream I didn’t really pay attention. However as a part of my Social Media spring cleaning I started paying attention to just who was showing up in the stream.

So when I saw a series of tweets from @fitnessalways I scratched my head and tried to remember when or why I would have added this ‘person’ to my timeline – after all fitness isn’t big on my list of interests. So I did a check on Twitter for this person’s Twitter page and just as I thought – I wasn’t subscribed to them. Yet there she was, showing up in my timeline.

Now I could unsubscribe since I hadn’t even subscribe in the first place so my only other option was to block them, which I did. I figured that would solve the problem after all block is suppose to mean they never show up on your timeline, or at least so I thought.

Apparently though I was wrong because another tweet from @fitnessalways just showed up in my timeline

fitnessalways

This isn’t the first time that I have found people I am not following showing up in my timeline and as far as I know previous blocks have been haphazard as well. So I ask you Twitter – what the hell is going on here?

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?