home of Steven Hodson a cranky old fart and social media un-expert

Currently browsing posts under the tag: browser.

4
When Half-Assed Is Good Enough

Back in March of last year I wrote a post about this idea of people being happy with just good enough user interfaces of web based applications and my feelings on the subject haven’t changed. If anything I have become even more convinced about the whole thing.

The idea that everything we do on a computer can; or should, be done with nothing more than a browser and a broadband connection is bothersome on so many levels. Firstly is the idea that broadband is even at the state where it will enable a full transition for using nothing but a browser to get all our work done is ludicrous at best.

Even with that in mind a lot of people seem to think that this is the road forward for our computing life. As Brett Nordquist said in a post this morning

That brings me to today. I still use a PC at work and home. But I’m no longer tied to Microsoft Windows. I current run Vista but it’s irrelevant to me. GMail has replaced Outlook. Google Docs has replaced Microsoft Office. Many of the utilities I used to purchase are no longer needed. The games I play are now online as are my blog, Facebook, Twitter and many other web properties where I spend the bulk of my time. I can’t think of a single program I run that requires Windows that I couldn’t live without or find a web based alternative.

While he was referring mainly to programs that run on the Windows operating system he closed out his post with the following

I hope by that time we’ll have PCs where the underlying OS is so small and reliable it fades into the background. I hope one day all I’ll need is a small form factor computer running Firefox and broadband connection.

As idyllic as that might sound and I am sure many a Linux and open source fanatic is just drooling all over themselves with the idea but if what we have today is any example it will be a half-assed world. How else would you classify a computing system that is totally reliant on a provider industry that can control your very access. Already we are seeing speed and data caps being instituted by these gatekeepers even though the wholesale rates for Internet bandwidth is dropping across the board.

In this new world of the browser dependent workflow bandwidth and access will be the new power. The problem with is that even now the US is being constantly outpaced by foreign countries. Even Canada has joined the US in the downward slide to bandwidth mediocrity and there is no improvement on the horizon. This as well doesn’t even address the disparity that will occur between the urban browser based workers and the rural areas where even now high speed broadband is something that they can only dream of or pay through the nose for.

In his post Brett talks about how things have changed since the days when networks were only in the realm of big companies and high speed meant 56k. So it might seem we have come a long way but if coming a long way means having to put up with inferior applications then it’s been a wasted 20 years. The idea that web based applications working within a single process container are in any way superior to applications being built to harness the ever increasing power in computers is half-assed. The idea that we should be totally reliant on third party access to the Internet that want to charge us more for ever decreasing access is half-assed.

For all its bluster Web 2.0 has done nothing more than make us all a bunch of people who are happy with half-assed solutions and that is a really sad place to be after 20 years.

Post tags: , ,

Category: The Web

28
Thanks Google Now I’m Going To Hell

Thanks a lot Google
I realize that a lot of diehard Google kool-aid drinkers would suggest that this would be going to heaven instead but this isn’t even close to a theological discussion. This is a discussion on how today Google may have just succeeded in changing the work flow patterns for a hellva lot of people. As much as I might not want to say this and I know the ribbing will start the moment a few people read this post but the fact is that Google has indeed changed the work flow patterns of at least one person – me.

They did this with one simple thing. It was a simple thing that they have been denying rumours of for almost two years now. Google release the first iteration of their Chrome browser and if unlike their other products they keep moving this forward things on the web and the desktop are going to change. Some folks are calling this the Internet Explorer killer or a shot across the bow of Microsoft in a fight for the cloud. The fact is that this – right now – is highly unlikely as the chances of Chrome breaking out of the narrow confines of the tech blogosphere and early adopters is pretty slim.

The browser that could take a real hit though is the current darling of the techies is FireFox. From working with it today I would think that if there is a solid mechanism in place for user scripts and serious work starts on converting FireFox favourites over to Chrome it might spell serious trouble for FireFox. An interesting thought as well is that because Chrome uses the same rendering engine as Safari that browser could improve significantly as more web developers start contributing to Webkit project.

However that isn’t really what I wanted to talk about in this post. As cool as it that Chrome is faster and uses less resources that isn’t where I think the real importance of the project lies. What I do believe is that Chrome is giving us a whole new way to create a usable work flow. It isn’t perfect yet and there are something that people may have to re-learn – just as I have been today – but once they begin to experiment with some of the things that Chrome can do the light might go off.

For the longest time I have been a desktop applications type of person. I never have been able to get my head wrapped around the idea that trying to do everything within the framework of a browser – as we knew them – was a good idea. For me the idea that having to switch between tabs of a program that was slowly consuming more and more resources as it was being used only to be able to maybe cut and paste a paragraph; or use a word processor when instead you wanted to check your email. Productivity from an overview perspective just didn’t make sense when using a browser for all your computing and web needs.

Now I don’t presume to suggest that this is the case for everyone but for my applications for the most part needed to living on the desktop as separate entities. I like all my programs that I use on a daily basis to be robust and responsive and for the most part I never got that from web based applications. Then on top of that having to work in a tabbed environment wasn’t productive for me. I wanted my FeedDemon as a separate application. I wanted my Windows Live Writer as a separate application. I didn’t like the idea of being locked into the tabs of a browser – especially ones that no matter what you did slowly consumed resources.

Google Chrome changed all that.

Not only have they made the browser experience faster they have also made one that doesn’t feed off of your resources like they are a never ending buffet. That though, is only the tip of the iceberg. they have also given you the ability to launch those separate web applications as separate desktop entities. No longer are you tied to the confines of the tabbed interfaces. You can have GMail as a application on your desktop. you can have FriendFeed as a separate work environment on your desktop. It doesn’t matter what is spread out there on your desktop they can all; to a point, talk to each other. click on a link in one of the satellite applications and it will load up in the main browser in a new tab. Want that tab as a one off item on your desktop then grab the tab and pull it over to the desktop area and let go. Voila you now have that as a separate application and when you are done with it you can either pull it back into Chrome or close it out. You can literally create a fluid desktop on the go and without devouring your resources in the process.

Like Chris Messina said today in response to Chrome making its debut – “To put it mildly, things just got a whole lot more exciting.” Once people begin to realize that it isn’t just about the speed or the smooth looks and begin to look at how their work flow can be improved then we might begin to realize just how the desktop has been changed.

My desktop with Chrome & 1 tear off & 2 applications

Post tags: , , , ,

Category: The Web

3
Chrome Makes Google’s Home Page

It’s only been a couple of hour since the Chrome web browser from Google was made available but it is now available from Google’s main page for everyone to grab.

ChromeOnGoogle

Post tags: , ,

Category: The Web

7
IE8 Not Ready For Prime Time Unless You Like Self-Abuse

Windows Internet Explorer 

Image via Wikipedia

 

As anyone who reads this blog regularly will know I like using Internet Explorer and am not a fan of Firefox. Additionally I have tried Opera through many of its versions but never stuck with it for whatever reasons. Where Safari is concerned I have tried it since the first version for Windows was made available and if it wasn’t for one bad bug I would probably end up using it over Internet Explorer. So being a regular user of IE I obviously was interested when they announced that the second beta of the browser was available for download and grabbed myself a copy.

I also know very well that this release was still considered a beta and as such isn’t meant for anything more than finding the bugs on the road to going gold. So with that understanding I installed IE yesterday and proceeded with my daily routine and waited to see when and how IE would fall down – if it did. As far as any of the settings for it I left everything at the defaults that it would have imported from my previous IE 7 install which will be the case with your average user who downloads and installs it. I won’t bother going into any great details about the changes or supposed improvements because that has already been well covered by Ed Bott which you can read about on his ZDNet blog.

What follows here instead is some of the problems that I have experienced in using this release. Some are ones that should be expected from Microsoft’s move the bring IE right up to current web standards and others are those weird and wonderful ones that come from using beta software. As a startup reference point the following graphic displays the resources begin used by a default install of IE 8 Beta 2 with 3 open tabs:

IE 8 Startup with 3 open tabs (Task Manager)

Now being the typical blogger that I am the first site I checked out in the browser was WinExtra which played pretty well with the only exception being the Lijit search widget. For some reason in IE it insists that the button goes under the text entry field but in IE7, Firefox and Safari it displays as it should right beside the text area

Lijit Search Widget

One other thing that I found wasn’t working in the way the plugin company or the blog owners intended it to is the Snap plugin. On blogs that have it enabled IE 8 users will see the following example when visiting

Snap plugin

Then whenever they hover a Snap linked item they will see the following

Snap Plugin

The displayed popup should be displayed right of off the linked text rather than the top left hand corner. While I am sure that most people won’t be concerned since the Snap plugin isn’t one of the more favoured plugins by blog visitors.

The one other big problem I had was with the Share This option link which allows visitors to share the selected post with their various networks like Digg. While it displays okay within the posts

Share This Link 

And it should show like this – as it does in Firefox

Share This Firefox

What we get on WinExtra when we click the link is this instead

Share This Extended IE8 WinExtra

And at this point the browser locks and when you look in Task Manager you see it chewing through resources where it starts from the base amount shown in the first graphic of the post and continues to climb until you kill the IE process in Task Manager

IE8 WinExtra Share This Extended

Restarting I figured I would try again using another site to test only to find that when I clicked on the Share This link the page went white

Share This New Tab Mashable

And once again looking in Task Manager we can see it chewing through the resources in the same way as it had done in the other test

Mashable Share This Extended

At this point I figure I have had enough fun and call it quits on any more checking out of Internet Explorer 8 because quite obviously – or at least from my experience – this browser isn’t ready for any real serious use. What I have to find out now is can this be rolled back to IE 7 or am I going to be really pissed at myself when I find out I’m stuck until the next release.

Related articles by Zemanta

Post tags: , , , ,

Category: The Web

11
The Browser is the New Operating System – NOT!

DESQview - what multitasking use to be like. It never fails lately that at some point usually intelligent people struggle forward with the inane proposition that the Internet and by proxy the web browser is the new operating system. I’m sorry but this is such a bullshit argument. It really is.

The latest screed to put forth this argument is courtesy of Timothy Lee over at Techdirt in which he suggests that because of the proliferation of API’s for all the different web services out there this means these services are being run out of a browser and in turn makes the browser a new operating system. The idea that running a mess of wired up web pages that only exist because of some API makes a browser an operating system is borderline stupid.

One of the underlying tenets of all modern operating systems is the ability to run as many applications as you want concurrently. Each of those programs accessible with the minimum fuss such as just selecting the window you want and easily being able to transfer data between those windows. When was the last time you tried to drag and drop data between two; or more, browser tabbed work areas? It can’t be done.

The idea that a browser with more and more open tabbed work areas is a productive way to work is stupid. As for the idea being anything new then people don’t know their software history very well. DESQView was doing exactly the same sort of things as a work-around to being able to multitask. It wasn’t alone either as DR-DOS, Novell DOS, and later OpenDOS did much the same thing.

Productivity requires a natural method to be able to switch between applications and share information – especially via drag and drop – easily. Having to constantly change between a growing number of tabs within a browser is not productive.

Safari tab hell

Proponents of the Web OS or the browser as an operating system can pontificate all they want about how this is the new platform but the fact is that without a real OS; whether it be Linux, Microsoft or Apple, a browser would have nothing to run on. With nothing to run on there is no way their new operating system of the web has a leg to stand on.

Post tags: , , , ,

Category: Technology and The Web

0
Saturday Afternoon Browser Roundup [1.27.07]

I should be safe in here Seems to have been a pretty light week for browser news which I guess on one hand is a good thing.

Put aside browser rivalry; use both of themSeattle Times

Ironically the release of IE 7, which I consider first-rate, seems to be prompting a significant number of people to take a look at the competing free browser from Mozilla.org called Firefox that is offering its 2.0.1 version.

Report: Cybercriminals Favor Web Browser AttacksTechNewsWorld

Bad news outweighs the good in the new “Threat Report 2007″ issued Monday by Sophos, the global IT security  company.

The good news, which might provide significant hope, is that computer users are finally refraining from opening attachments connected to unsolicited e-mail .

Because of that, according to Sophos, hackers are moving away from the devious practice of using those attachments as conduits for virus attacks. Sophos said it found only one e-mail for every 337 was infected in 2006, while one in 44 were infected in 2005.

Internet Explorer 7 Is Still Not Safe EnoughPC World

Microsoft’s Internet Explorer 7 offers significant security improvements over its deservedly criticized predecessor. But the new IE still does not do enough to protect users.

Microsoft has, in IE 7, locked down some of the problem areas in IE 6. The browser will permit a Web site to nag you only once about installing an ActiveX control, for instance. (Some users will approve an installation simply to get rid of the pop-up windows.)

Microsoft sends out IE8 Feature Survey E-mailNeowin

Microsoft has sent out an e-mail entitled “IE8 Feature Survey is Now Available!” to all Tech Beta participants. The company has emphasized that the e-mail has been sent out to many but that a smaller group will be doing the hands-on testing of the new release. The e-mail states that Microsoft is in the “planning phase” which could mean anything from being at the drawing board or at the point where the software giant is simply interested in adding on features.

Post tags: , , ,

Category: The Web

Page 1 of 212