Posts with tag "Video"

Video comments – another case of “just because we can”

To video coment or not to Video comment that is the non-question I can see the tsunami wave of adoption building now ever since TechCrunch announced that it was going to be adding support for video comments to posts. I am seeing a few more posts showing up discussing the whole idea but for me it is just another matter of doing it because we can. That doesn’t mean that it is a good idea or that it is even something that will be used beyond the first blush of coolness.

It makes total sense for Seesmic to be excited about the idea because it is a great way to get their brand out to a wider audience but that doesn’t mean that it is a good solution for blog owners or even the readers of those blogs. While I might not be as extreme in the idea of video blogging or Seesmic being useless as Frederic from The Last Podcast is I do agree with him that for blog comments text is the better medium.

For comments on a blog – text is a far better medium. Why? Scannability – by human and computer.

I can easily scan through the 150 comments on the TechCrunch post announcing this ‘feature’ in a minute. But if I wanted to watch 150 videos, that would take me forever – and there is no indication right now of how long they are before you click on them, btw.

A computer can do the same and look for spam and, if I so prefer, profanities, racial slurs etc.

All of this, I give up when I use video for my comments.

Then Corvida over at SheGeeks makes a valid point that regardless of the hype around the idea this isn’t anything revolutionary and that really when push comes to shove as readers of blogs do really have all that time available to A) read the post and B) view any of the video comments that are there

Video comments are, in general, a major time waster because of our hectic schedules. Recording it, uploading it, and then having to sit there and view it; do you notice how much time that’s taking up? You might as well just type your comment out and save readers the trouble. Readers barely have enough time to read an entire blog post, let alone sit and watch a video with a response that could’ve been typed out for scanning purposes.

Now while the current Seesmic plugin is geared to WordPress based blogs using the default comment system I saw over on Howard Lindzon’s blog that the folks over at Disqus are working very quickly to have the idea compatible with Disqus. I can understand this from a business point of view especially when you have someone like Howard as one of your investors but I would have far preferred that time being spent on getting working support for pingbacks and trackbacks in place. That is something that is of far more benefit to the bloggers and users.

The question is now – will I enabled the feature if Disqus gets support for it working?

Not unless the majority of my readers request it.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

How to scare little children – show them a video blog

Monsters in the dark in your video One of things that is really cool about FriendFeed is the wide variety of things you can see and read. Whether it be posts themselves to what people are reading right up to videos that people have posted to their blogs. As cool as this I really have to take a moment and point out something.

Some of these video blogs are scary enough to give little kids nightmares. I’m not talking about the content of the videos themselves. No I’m talking about the presentation. Have you really looked at how some of these videos look?

First off you have some person staring down at you like they are ten feet tall. What’s with this looking down to the camera anyway. Isn’t it possible to look straight forward or are you going for the intimidation factor here? I always feel like I have to scrunch up in my chair to get away from that towering over me impression.

Then there is this whole thing with lighting. Like .. what’s with the recording in semi darkness with what little light there is throwing enough shadows around the face to make you look like something crawling out of a cave. Would it be so hard to take a few minutes and make sure the lighting doesn’t remind one of Dr. Frankenstein’s castle lab.

Remember folks there are little children out there who are going to see these things at some point – do you want to be responsible of giving them nightmares?

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Crossing my fingers for Leo

Who wouldn't want to work in an office like this - sweet The other day Frederic over at The Last Podcast had a post where he was talking about why he thought someone like Oprah could potentially provide a turning point for podcasting to go mainstream. I was thinking about that today when I was reading Leo Laporte’s post on his future adventures now that The Lab has been closed.

If it is the case that podcasting can turn that popularity corner because of the influence of someone like Oprah I wonder if Leo’s plans for live streaming could do the same for video. Sure there has been things like iJustine with the requisite amount of sex appeal but that still didn’t do anything really really for videocasting other than being a news bite for mainstream media outlets.

Some folks might want to point out the efforts of people like Robert Scoble and his new endeavors involving video. The problem is that Robert tends to be more of a positive and negative focal point around what he is doing. It is no fault of Robert’s that this happens but rather a byproduct of his enthusiasm and how the tech world reacts to his enthusiasm.

Chris Pirillo is another early adopter of live videocasting but again I think he suffers from the same thing as Robert – he is both a positive and negative focal point around any technology he is using at the moment to further his brand. There is nothing wrong with this but it can hold back on folks looking to partake in this new information flow.

With Leo however there is almost a commonality with the average internet user that makes him more accessible. It is this accessibility that I think will have the potential to step past the current personality barriers that keep videocasting from really taking off.

Leo acknowledges in his post that podcasting is the more popular medium of the two but he still feels that live videostreaming can be something to capture peoples attention

Our minor experiments in doing video versions of TWiT have convinced me that audio is the more popular medium. TWiT audio gets many times more downloads than video. That makes sense to me, since people have more time to listen to audio than they do to sit down and watch video. But there’s something about video that captures people’s attention. I’ll go one step further, there’s something about live video that’s very compelling for both viewers and hosts. I’ve missed live TV ever since TechTV went under four years ago, and I’ve been looking for some way to get that excitement back

He goes on to add that this isn’t a vehicle to reproduce typical TV models and slap a web terminology around it

I’m not interested in duplicating existing television models – I want to deconstruct TV and get to something more direct, more intimate, and much more two-way.

I hope he does pull this off and as a person who very rarely watches tech video – live or otherwise – I think for this I’ll be tuning in.

Best of luck Leo and I have my fingers crossed for you.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Laughing all the way to the bank

Watching a movie through a keyhole - Now that's fun. One of the big pushes these days seems to be cell phones that can play music and videos. Can someone please explain to me .. WTF … I mean call me stupid but why would anyone in their right mind want to watch TV or a movie on a piddly assed cell phone screen.

Come on folks let’s get a grip here for a minute and think this through. You are going to take all that time to download what has to be an inferior quality copy of some TV show or movie and watch it on a screen the size of a 20 pack of smokes – at best. Granted some movies and such aren’t worth watching in high quality to begin with but still what is the point. Doing something like that reminds me of seeing Harry Chapin live at the Orpheum Theater sitting so high in the cheap seats my back was against the wall – literally. At least that was worth it but the idea of watch Friends re-runs on a cell phone makes me shudder.

Putting that silliness aside for a moment what about the cost? You think that your provider is gonna just flip a switch and the movie will be on your cell phone in all it’s glory – not bloody likely. It’s gonna cost you and I bet it’s gonna cost you a lot. You think your cell phone bill is high now – just wait until your little darlings start downloading the newest rap videos or honey next to you grabs the occasional porn adult video for you both to watch.

Talk about paying top dollar for lowering your entertainment expectations. There is only going to be one winner here and guess what – it isn’t you. No, the only winner is your cell phone provider as they run laughing to the bank with your wallet in tow.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

A tip for VLC users in Vista RC1

One of my favorite media apps is VLC by VideoLAN but when I tried to use it in Vista it would kill the Areo Glass feature; something about video incompatibility or some such.

While browsing around for other stuff though I ran across a tip that said to change the Video output module to OpenGL (Preferences -> Video -> Output Modules — with Advanced Options enabled)

I am happy to report that it works great and I am back using one of my favorite apps.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?