Posts with tag "Technology"

CobWEBs Daily Edition podcast: Abused patents, gratuitous blogging – isn’t technology grand

cbn1-podpost Tonight’s show with myself and Sean covers a few topics but with a common underlying thought – there are important things out there that need to be talked about but Twitter and Facebook banalities win out.

While the larger news was Microsoft being told it lost its appeal and would have to make changes to Word or not sell it Sean and I look at the underlying problem with patent abuse and how it is hurting innovation. This lead right into a brief discussion about copyrights and how they are being attacked in different countries around the world.

We finish up with a few thoughts on the ridiculous discussion that has popped up once again about RSS feeds and readers.

Posts referred to in the show

BREAKING – Microsoft slapped hard by court: Can’t sell Word – The Inquisitr
For All the Gloom Around RSS, Readers Continue to Climb – Louis Gray

Enjoy the show.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

TechCrunch conference not as important as poker

sacks Or at least it’s not as important as placing at the World Series of Poker and if your name is David Sacks (CEO of Geni/Yammer).

According to Michael Arrington Sacks is scheduled to speak at the Real-Time Stream CrunchUp conference hosted by TechCrunch. Right now however it is day one of the three day poker tournament and David Sacks is up by $91,000. Day three of the tournament falls on the same day as the TechCrunch conference.

Sacks apparently told Arrington that if he was still in the money at the tournament he wouldn’t be able to speak at the conference. This apparently hasn’t made Arrington a very happy camper

The tournament has just started so there isn’t much to report yet. One concern we have – Sacks is set to speak at our real time event this Friday, which is day three of the tournament. He told me today that if he makes it to day three he “has to play,” and won’t make the event. My response? It was NSFW.

Good luck to everyone. Except Sacks. I hope he loses it all on day 2.

Granted Sacks, if he makes it to day three, could have a shot at winning part of the $50 million prizes being awarded but pissing off Arrington in the process? I sure hope Sacks wins enough to offset the slapfest Arrington will probably have if Sacks skips out on the conference.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Canada: 28th out of 30 in the Digital World

2009-06-08_1629 I have never been shy about my thoughts about Canada’s declining place in our technological world. We have gone from being one of the most respected leaders in technology to being a laggard as we fall behind countries we use to lead. this is something that we could turn around if we had a government that was more interested in being a leader instead of being a lackey to US entertainment industry or Canadian born telecom monopolies.

Or as Michael Geist told the Senate Standing Committee on Transport and Communication hearing on May 26th

First, Canada is relatively expensive, ranking 14th for monthly subscription costs at $45.65.  By comparison, Japan comes in at $30.46 and the UK at $30.63,

Second, the Canadian Internet is slow, ranking 24th out of the 30 countries. It is truly a different Internet experience for people in Japan, Korea, and France, where the speed allows for applications and opportunities that we don’t have.  Moreover, Canada lags behind in fibre connections with 0% penetration.  Japan sits at 48%, Korea at 43%, and Sweden at 20%.  Even the U.S. is at 4%.

Third, when you combine these two – price and speed – Canada drops to 28th out of 30 countries for price per megabyte.  In other words, we pay more for less than consumers in almost any other country in the OECD. 

Fourth, Canada is one of only four countries where consumers have no alternative but to take a service with bit caps.  Almost all other OECD countries have more choice.

I’m not the only one to feel our country is being left behind as there is a real push by concerned groups in this country, the University of Waterloo among them, who want to see this change. Part of that change is a new event called Canada 3.0 which apparently is beginning to snowball, attracting a lot of attention as it attracts over a 1,000 delegates and a growing number of business leaders and politicians.

Prof. Coates said taking a lead in digital media includes everything from developing copyright rules and compensation models for online content, to training and keeping in Canada people who understand this new economy. Among the ideas being floated is something called the Canada Project, a plan to get Canadian content online, starting with the holdings of the national archives and moving well beyond that.

Tom Jenkins, CEO of Waterloo software company Open Text and a driving force behind the conference, argues Canada needs a visionary project to capture the public imagination for what is a dry policy topic. Such a project would play a role similar to the space race, he said, which led to unprecedented technological advances.

Source: Elizabeth Church :: The Globe and Mail

As nice as all these positive thoughts might be I don’t believe anything will happen until we see a change in the federal government – but it has to be a change that includes a real desire to take our country out of this technological morass. that will take a lot of backbone and I’m not sure anyone on our political landscape has one anymore.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

File Archiver: 7-Zip – Compact your crap!

When I bought my first “IBM”-compatible computer, it came with a 500MB hard disk.  Applications back then didn’t hog as much space as they do now, but storage still became an issue, hence the advent of the Archival Utility. Taking that 700k MIDI file down to 500k was significant savings, plus the ability to “bundle” several files together was handy.

You can read the whole post over here at WinExtra

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

The Power Grid Imperative

power gridsAs we march down this technological road with increasing haste there are two definite areas of our society where incredible change must happen. It is no longer a matter of letting nature takes its own course or for businesses in these two areas to be left to their own devices. There is too much at risk and our timetable to make the needed societal changes is growing shorter.

These two seemingly disparate areas are transportation and power and rather than being the separate and distinct entities we think they are they in fact are interdependent on each other. This interdependency is only going to increase as we move forward the question is are these two segments of our society ready for our overall changing society.

While much attention is being focused on the transportation industries where some are facing a very bleak future the fact is that our power delivery systems are in much rougher shape.

After all this is the delivery system which in 2003 brought much of the northeast United States and the province of Ontario in Canada to its knees because of a blackout caused by a single event which then cascaded out of control. Much of the affected areas were without power for the better part of three days which I can attest to personally given that I live in Ontario.

It was a cascading effect that ended up shutting down approximately 100 power stations and left a lot of people questioning whether our power grid is capable of maintaining the current user needs – let alone an increasing need in the future as we look to alleviate some of our transportation problem by moving to electric based vehicles.

This doesn’t even take into account the natural increase of need due to a growing population which in the U.S. has caused many states to require power utilities to add an aggregate of nearly 40 gigawatts of clean energy production by 2030. Until then much of our power will come from the typical sources of hydroelectric production, coal fire production and to a lesser degree nuclear powered energy. there is much talk of trying to broaden our power production to include alternate methods like wind, solar and a myriad of other still experimental methods.

The problem is that all this power is going to be funneled into a power grid system that is antiquated at best, broken at the the worst. It is one thing to have power being generated; regardless of whether it is clean or dirty, but if the delivery mechanism is faulty, or ineffective and making that available power progressively expensive to the customers then all the power generation in the world won’t make one bit of difference.

As much as there might be pressure to radically change our transportation systems; whether they be public transportation or revamping the automotive sector, there is an even more urgent need in my mind for an immediate rebuilding of our power grids system(s). While much of the grids are a state; or provincial, regulated system I believe they need to become more of a federally mandated policy and oversight. The whole power network is no longer just something that affects a small portion of people; especially when they start crashing.

I believe that we to realize that we need a massive works project that will build out a fully planned  nationwide power grid system; not just a collection of individually controlled grids. Yes this is going to cost a lot of money which as Craig Rubens at the Earth2Tech blog points out will cost $2 trillion for a fully green power grid

In order to meet the Renewable Portfolio Standards of states, utilities will need to add an aggregate of nearly 40 gigawatts of clean energy generation by 2030. And to get all that power to customers, a total investment of as much as $2 trillion into transmission and distribution networks will be required, according to a report released today by energy consultancy The Brattle Group.

The question is then do we have the political will in both the U.S. and Canada to undertake such a massive rebuilding of one of our most essential services. As well we have to ask ourselves what will happen if we don’t. I don’t think it is a matter of when will we do this anymore, but more of how soon can we start.

Related articles by Zemanta

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

PJ’s Forum Round-up 24.11.08

We had a relatively subdued but good week in the forums.  Nobody died in the flame fests and everyone seems reasonably sane, still.  Mrs. Max has decided to return to our flock, welcome back.

The Brits have a happy group of folks called the BNP.  First I’d heard of them.  Apparently they aren’t so happy anymore since their membership list leaked.  *covers mouth*  Oppps.  I don’t think they’re gonna get a Mulligan on that one.

To read the complete post head over to the WinExtra Blog

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Placing Too Much Faith In The Web To Be The Keeper Of Our History

Human beings are incredible pack rats of our own history but nowhere is this more evident than in our desire to record our travels through life and history with the written word. We use that written history to try and teach own future generations the mistakes that we have made or the incredible things we have done that have made the human being unequalled in the history of our world.

Unfortunately though our ways of keeping that history within our grasp is so very fragile. Historians lament even today over what was lost to mankind with the burning of the Library of Alexandria. Even today as Robert Scoble notes in his post about how the web is disappearing he references the fires at the Library of Congress that have destroyed parts of our history:

I also visited the Library of Congress a couple of weeks ago and talked with some of their top archivists. They told me story after story of human knowledge and historical documents from our lifetimes that were destroyed. Heck, the Library of Congress itself has been destroyed by fire twice. I visited Thomas Jefferson’s library which was sold to the Library to get it started again after a fire wiped out its collections.

As we move more and more into an electronic world where everything is computerized; and massive efforts to scan the sum total of all human knowledge into the bowls of our electronic worlds, one has to wonder if this is the better way to go. Even with all its fragility the paper upon which we record our present as it moves into the past has withstood the test of time better than our electronic versions.

We might like to believe that once our history has been tapped in by way of a keyboard or scanned in that it is there forever but we seem to forget that even technology has a lifespan. CDs and DVDs once thought to last forever by most people have been found to suffer from techno-rot and even hard drives can get tired and die. In contrast the written word whether it be on paper, papyrus or even gold has survived for 2,500 years.

Our human history is the greatest gift we have and as much as we might like to think that technology is the ultimate solution to everything we do this isn’t always the case. We like to believe that once we have entered everything about us and our collective actions as we travel through the present into massive data banks owned by corporations that it will be there forever. I believe this is a great mistake to be making because regardless of how much we can cram into an electronic byte it will never outlast a single word written word on the most fragile of all our invention – the piece of paper.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

How Not To Be Liked On FriendFeed

While this post sort of singles out FriendFeed I believe the basic idea can be translated to any of the popular socila media services because this is more about social media than just any one service. I use FriendFeed because that is where I inadvertantly conducted a bit of a reader experiment yesterday. I say inadvertant because each of the two posts that showed up on FriendFeed were written hours apart and it wasn’t until after the FriendFeed Likes and Comments for the second post started coming in that something I had been edging around for some time came together.

When I wrote the first post - Wow There Is A World Beyond Social Media – it really was more of thoughts that sprung out of reading Alexander van Elsas’ excellent post. While his post was the springboard it fit in nicely with many thoughts I had been having about social media lately. Then later that evening I wrote another post that basically took Robert Scoble to task for a comment he had made about FriendFeed’s growth stalling. In effect I had set up to opposing views with those posts. One calling the importance of social media and its services into question and the other praising a specific service found within social media.

With the first post the responses on FriendFeed were negliable but Hutch had something of interest to say in the comments of the post itself

What audience are you addressing? If you want to write about hardware, security, operating systems, photographers’ rights, etc., can’t you just do that? Should others stop reading and writing about what interests them? Engadget and Gizmodo seem to be doing all right not covering social media. So, on that score, I agree there’s a world beyond social media. Write about what you care about man!

My reply to Hutch’s comment was

the problem for me Hutch; and for other bloggers as well, that want to be
able to use FriendFeed as a source – a way to hear about the interesting
stuff that they are interested in won’t find it on FriendFeed. Just read
through the comments and conversations there – how much do you hear about
security .. how much do you hear about non-web based software … how much
do you hear people discussing operating systems. I have posted link related
to all three and not one of them has had so much as a Like let alone a
comment.
If you want to talk about social media and FriendFeed then yes that is the
place to be but as far as tech related conversations it has a very narrow
focus. that doesn’t mean that I won’t keep using it but it definitely isn’t
my prime source of things that I am trying to talk about. I like FriendFeed
and think it is a great place to hang out so don’t take what I say as a
negative.

My point here that I was trying to make that as much as I like FriendFeed and like to use it as source it is only valuable in that aspect if you want to talk about social media. If you want to talk about technology other than social media and FriendFeed then right now this isn’t the place to be. Even looking at FriendFeed right now the conversations are revolving around politics, general life type stuff and social media related items. Nowhere in today’s timestream will you find next to anything about other technologies unless in some round about way they related to social media.

The second post on the other hand was all about FriendFeed; and social media by proxy, and how it was a growing and vibrant place to hang out. this is very true in the general sense of things andrally doesn’t contradict my first post in any fashion. It just showed how people are using FriendFeed for all types of converstaions andwhile that is a good thing for people wanting to talk about all kinds of technology it isn’t such a great place. This is especially true if you are a blogger trying to use FriendFeed and a reliable source of what is happening right now.

Now the interesting thing here is when we look at the FriendFeed stats of Likes and Comments for each of the posts because this is where you can see the real bias for social media discussions versus other types of tech discussions. With the first post – Wow There Is A World Beyond Social Media – we have a total of 10 Likes and 2 Comments. Now contrast that with the second post – FriendFeed Is Growing Nicely Regardless Of What Scoble Says – where we have a total of 52 Likes and 42 Comments. It is obvious to see where the overwhelming interest is.

This post is not meant in any fashion to be a indictment against peoples preferences. Rather it is meant to show; good or bad, that once you get caught up within any of the social media services it is very easy to find one’s focus become very narrow. I purposely do by best to make sure that the people I follow are across a broad spectrum to try and not get sucked into this myopic view but that hasn’t changed the results I see when using something like FriendFeed. Just as FriendFeed has become a political junkies dream hunting ground it also shows that technology interests are skewed in a specific direction.

My take away from all this is that while FriendFeed is a great place to hang out don’t expect to get any great reaction if you blog about technologies that are centered around social media. That said though I’m not going to let this experience alter what I write about and who knows maybe I’ll help expand the technology horizon found on FriendFeed a little.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?