Posts with tag "Stowe Boyd"

Washington Post’s Twitter ruckus exposes social media bubble

bubbles I am probably going to get slammed for this, maybe even be referred to as a dinosaur again, but I’ve never been one to not express my opinion just because some people might not like it. As well I want to also state this right off the bat ….

I do not agree with The Washington Post’s recent policy guidelines regarding social media.

We clear on that?

Yesterday I wrote a post about WaPo’s issuing of guidelines for its journalist to use when it comes to social media services like Twitter or Facebook. It was a result of what turned out to be a snippet post by Stowe Boyd that left the impression that WaPo had basically outlawed the use of Twitter for its journalists. In the comments Stowe suggested I read his follow up post regarding the subject – which I did.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Weekend playtime in the blogosphere

Play nice kiddies Yup … it’s the weekend and the kiddies are bickering once more in the tech blogosphere; or at the very least they are polishing their egos and feelings of self-importance.

It appears to have all started with a post yesterday by Dave Winer explaining why Facebook sucks – like this is something that a lot of people haven’t already been saying. I guess though it takes an A-Lister like Dave to make it real.

Hot on the heels of Dave’s post of course came Robert Scoble bemoaning the fact that he’s not allowed anymore than 5,000 friends in Facebook equating it to locking his rolodex in a trunk. Well jeez Robert that’s what happens when you play in a walled garden where the people running the playground set the rules.

All this A-List angst over a closed system is borderline funny when you consider that these self same folks who downplay the whole idea of there even being an A-List that should be treated differently than the rest of us are the first to line up behind the Web 2.0 customer complaint desk when they have to play by the same rules as the rest of us.

But then as Robert said on Twitter today Facebook should be doing everything they can to make the A-Lister’s a bunch of content little kiddies playing in the sand pile:

Scobleizer said at 10/14/2007 1:01:20 PM
And if Facebook wants “A listers” to hype it up (which they do) then they gotta serve us and make sure we’re happy too.

Please don’t make me gag over such self-importance because as much as you might think that Facebook will live or die because of the hallowed words from the A-List the fact is they will probably be a lot happier once you have all tip toed through the tulips to the next shiny new thing but leaving the hundred’s of thousands of people who followed you to play like nice little kiddies in the walled garden not demanding any special treatment and making them millions of dollars in the process.

Of course all through this I’m important so treat me special byplay, folks on Twitter were treated to a public; at least to those who followed the participants, bickering between our illustrious leaders of the tech blogosphere where Stowe Boyd felt he needed to let us know he needed to respond to Dave Winer and the show went on from there:

stoweboyd said at 10/14/2007 2:57:41 PM
have to respond to Dave Winer’s newest before lunch

davewiner said at 10/14/2007 3:11:18 PM
Stowe Boyd is a creep. I’ve been wanting to say that for quite a long time. Now I have. Onward.

stoweboyd said at 10/14/2007 3:11:25 PM
Dave Winer Doesn’t Get Face book: http://tinyurl.com/yteyr9

Scobleizer said at 10/14/2007 3:13:59 PM
Stowe Boyd: you’re wrong, but that’s OK. Facebook itself says it’s a “utility.” To me it’s a rolodex.

stoweboyd said at 10/14/2007 3:22:39 PM
just because they have dubbed themselves a ‘utility’ doesn’t mean they are a rolodex. Its an interactive space where people meet and talk.

stoweboyd said at 10/14/2007 3:33:21 PM
@davewiner – Thanks Dave. Nice. Tasteful. I feel that you don’t get it, but I wasn’t attacking your character or intelligence. Pretty low.

stoweboyd said at 10/14/2007 3:35:08 PM
I guess I join the club of people publicly savaged by Dave Winer. Hey, Jason make room!

davewiner said at 10/14/2007 3:39:04 PM
@stoweboyd, oh come now. that’s 1/100th of the personal crap you’ve said about me. don’t be such a martyr.

stoweboyd said at 10/14/2007 3:59:07 PM
The worst thing I’ve written about you is that I don’t agree with you often. I said this a few months back: http://tinyurl.com/2gvsw4

Yup it’s the weekend and the kiddies need to play …. good thing tomorrow is Monday and we can get back to some real news to write about huh :)


Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Kettle meet pot

Kettle calling pot black I had originally planned on letting the discussion over Andrew Keen’s new book; The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet is Killing our Culture, slide on by. I was even going to pass on pointing out how an article on the Globe and Mail website about Andrew and his book was willing to name those who have come out against Andrew but fail to follow even the most basic blogging etiquette by linking back to them; but then I guess when you’re a newspaper pretending to be bloggers you don’t need to follow etiquette.

I was even going to pass it by when it so pointedly made obvious some basic truths about the blogging world. After all how do you argue against a truth like

Internet culture, often portrayed as the vanguard of progress, is actually a jungle peopled by intellectual yahoos and digital thieves, according to a Silicon Valley entrepreneur-turned-dissenter.

Where I couldn’t turn back though was when I read a post by Stowe Boyd today on the matter and his opinion of Andrew. Sure the post that started by calling Andrew Keen an elitist was largely a cut and paste (with link back of course) of another blogger’s; Kevin Marks, opinion but it was the last paragraph that got my attention

Meanwhile, I have found myself softening to trolls like Keen, Dvorak, and Carr. Perhaps because I believe that they increasingly don’t matter, and that the majority of people have no time for them: even the extremely literate and wired.

It amazed me the audacity to call another person elitist and yet in the same breath declare them as not being important. To assume that just because one person’s viewpoint has no value because you consider them nothing more than a troublesome waste of space is nothing more than a glorification of your own value.

Who really is the elitist?

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

There is always a flipside

Will we all wear one at some point? A couple of days ago the big firestorm in the blogosphere was the in comment death threats being experienced by Kathy Sierra; which I wrote about here. Today via Stowe Boyd and Doc Searls comes the flipside of the mess. It is from Alan Herrel to Doc Searls and it relates what happened from his side of the fence.

I am putting the whole post out there; which I hope won’t tick off the people involved as this is what Stowe has done as well. This is done to assure that nothing is being done to lose the clarity of the feelings.

[from The Doc Searls Weblog : Tuesday, March 27, 2007]

Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:25:52 -0700
From: alan herrell
To: Doc Searls
Subject: Kathy Sierra

Doc,

(sorry I haven’t written before this as I have been doing damage control for my clients)

I am writing this to you as the guy who can forward it to everybody that matters.
I am writing this from a new computer, using an email address that will be deleted at the end of this.
I am no longer me. My main machine despite my best efforts has been hacked, my accounts compromised including my email. and has been disconnected from the internet.
How did this happen? When did this happen? shit doc, i don’t have a fucking clue. I thought i was pretty sharp. I guess not.
just about every online account that i have has been compromised. Most importantly my digital identity and user/password for typepad and wordpress. I have been doing damage control, for my clients. How the fuck i got to be part of this mess is revolting.
The Kathy Sierra mess is horrific. I am not who ever used my identity and my picture!!
I am sick beyond words over this whole episode. Kathy Sierra may not be on my top 10 list , but nobody deserves this filthy character assaination.
But everything I have written about her or anyone else has been in public.
Jesus Doc, In the ten years I have been online, i have never used any sort of screen name or hidden behind psedonyms.
I have always posted and written as me. I have prided myself on the fact that I stand behind everything I wrote. Blogging made it much better in keeping the dialogue public.
That folks think that this mess is the sort they believe I would do is disheartening.
I may not be the the most popular guy, but I like to think i have been honest. And I say again I have *always* done this publicly.
For Kathy and Maryam and anybody else I am deeply sorry. Nobody deserves this.
Whatever credibility I may have had is down the toilet. For this I am profoundly saddened.
I liked being who I was warts and all.
I have over the course of my time online met some of the brightest people that I would never have the abilty to sit across from to break bread or share coffee with from around the world. How wonderful is that.
In 1997 I wrote that I believed that the internet was the most important invention of the human race. I believe it even more today as I write this.
It will probably some time before I attempt to join the great conversation again, but, Please don’t let bastards grind you down.
sincerely

alan herrell the head lemur (retired)

I know that in terms of Internet time this will fade quickly from memory; which is a shame in my opinion. I only hope that Kathy returns to blogging sooner than later.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Blogger popularity: breaking the 5,000 channel universe

Making it big Is there a critical mass that a blogger has to reach before he or she can say that they have joined the ranks of the most popular blogs?

After all there are so many damn blogs out there. Blogs for every area of life; whether it is excellent ones about the weirdness of life (Boing Boing and my favorite Zero Boss are just two) to technology blogs of all flavors much like WinExtra. It is a number that is constantly shifting as new blogs come online and old ones die or lay forgotten. By Technorati accounting they are tracking some 66 million blogs.

That’s a lot of damn blogs for anyone to consider let alone try and rise to the cream of the top – the Technorati A-List; but it doesn’t stop there. There is one level even within the A-List that is like blogger nirvana – the Technorati 100.

After all even by the Technorati breakdown; best explained here at Kindera’ Blog, the A-List itself is a monster when placed against the vast number of blogs world-wide:

The Very High Authority Group [A-List Bloggers] (500 or more blogs linking in the last 6 months)
In the final group we see what might be considered the blogging elite. This group, which represents more than 4,000 blogs, exhibits a radical shift in post frequency as well as blog age. Bloggers of this type have been at it longer – a year and a half on average – and post nearly twice a day, an increase in posting volume of over 100% from the previous group. Many of the blogs in this category, in fact, are about as old as Technorati and we’ve grown up together. Some of these are full-fledge professional enterprises that post many, many times per day and behave increasingly like our friends in the mainstream media. As has been widely reported, the impact of these bloggers on our cultures and democracies is increasingly dramatic.

So to pull the top 100 out of that much noise is an incredible feat especially when you consider it is all based on one simple thing – links. Take for example Engadget at number one spot who has 26,271 blogs that link to it within the last 6 months. From there you head to the bottom of the 100 and find it currently occupied by Robert “Mr. Blogger” Scoble who only has a measly 3, 177 blogs linking to him.

With linking being the key you get a lot of bloggers offering their Best Of methods for getting and giving links much like you would find on John Chow’s site, all for the purpose of trying to rise above the din of the blogosphere.

While much is made of playing the linking game and having quality content the chances of making it as a professional blogger is a daunting task. Much more daunting when you realize that the A-List is not the end all be all of blogging; because as even the Technorati ranking show you can be one of the 4,000+ A-Listers but that doesn’t equate with being popular.

So what does it really take to reach that critical mass that once reached you find yourself in the realm of popular blogs?

Is it just the number of links; which really considering the flotsam of junk blogs out there playing the linking game makes that part questionable. After all just how many of those 26,000+ links that Engadget has are value added links in contrast to garbage links.

Could being popular mean having your content, your ideas being mentioned consistently much like Dave Winer or Stowe Boyd. Or could it being involved on a regular basis in comments conversations with the likes of Mathew Ingram (a fellow Canuck) or John Calacanis.

As I crawl my way toward the B-List I think about and read much of what is written about promoting oneself and gaining links; but I think one can walk a very fine line between providing value in one’s backlink and becoming a link slut. Personally I think it is better to take the longer road, have people talk about your thoughts, pass your ideas around and give value to your link worth.

Better to be a Katherine Hepburn of links than a Paris Hilton; after all popularity can be longer lasting; and be more rewarding, when you add something to the conversation than it is when you are looking to add links like trophies on a wall.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?