Posts with tag "internet"
40million

Social Media is the new Internet – Gawd you gotta love hyperbole

As is the habit when Tim O’Reilly pontificates the pundits and guru’s all get one great big enormous woodie and then proceed to fall all over themselves either massaging his words or adding their own dribble onto his latest missive. In this case the starting point for what is sure to be the <puke> next hot topic </puke> to be made into PowerPoint slideshows or start yet another slew of over-priced conferences whose only purpose will be to dissect and market the great words of Mr. Tim was his post about the Internet being the new Operating System.

True to form and well within the First 24 Hour Ruling* we started getting what is bound to be the first of many posts that A) clap themselves on the back for being so prescient and B) use it to justify their own opinions about how they see the Internet. The one that caught my eye this morning as I was trying to work my way through my first pot of coffee was one by Tac Anderson titled If The Internet Is The New Operating System, Social Media is the New Internet (gee .. see how clever he was there – great SEO – as to be expected I guess).

Well before we even delve into the ridiculousness of that suggestion let’s clear up a misconception (for about the 100th time).

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

I think Steven Rubel’s mind has become waterlogged from Lifestreaming too much

bowl_of_stupid I see a lot of really off the wall ideas and conversations during a day to the point I often wonder if anything will make me shake my head it total and utter bewilderment anymore.

Then along comes Steve Rubel with a statement that stops me dead in my tracks and raise my head to the sky all the while muttering “Oh Lord….”. After all what more can you do when someone said that the future of the web is one without sites.

Sure on the surface that hits all the wet and warm spots of the social media mavens but when you look at the reasoning that both Rubel and Paul Gillin give for this so-called inevitable future of the web – well – let the head shaking commence.

This of course comes hot on the heels of a post by MG Siegler at TechCrunch about the Associated Press directing all their traffic to their Facebook page.

Steve thinks this is a news game changer

The AP is now changing the game for news by not only going where attention spirals are taking us but by also using their content to curate a conversation on Facebook and – above all – build relationships.

Paul Gillin says this about the site-less web

These are the first ripples in a wave of new technology that will make the Internet effectively site-less. By that I mean that the metaphor of the Web as we’ve known it for the last 15 years is breaking down. The Internet is increasingly not about sites but about content and people

So let me get this straight. The future of the web, and all its incredible richness, is going to be places like Facebook, Twitter, Buzz and Foursquare.

If this is what the future of the web is going to be like then we will lose more than we gain.Contrary to what Steve Rubel thinks the AP isn’t a visionary in the least. They have just found a new way to concentrate and control their product.

There’s nothing visionary about that.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Cogeco Cable confusing it’s customers? Tell me something new.

screwed Up here in Canada we don’t have the luxury, regardless of how the companies involved like to spin it, of real competition when it comes to broadband Internet access. We have Bell Canada deciding to throttle the speed of third party ISPs who buy wholesale broadband access from the telecommunication giant because they don’t want competitors offering faster service than what they offer their own residential and business customers.

This is the same company that has also announced the closing of their online video store, leaving customers holding the bag with videos that they will no longer be able to play (thank you DRM), so they can concentrate on their Online TV service. At the same time we have Rogers appearing to revisit to controversy again over injecting Rogers’ content into users browsing activity.

Now we find out that Cogeco in their effort to further screw their customers through their instituting metered billing back in April can’t even get the software being used to track usage to work right.

After a several month adjustment period where customer usage was tracked but not billed, Cogeco was supposed to start billing in June. Judging from posts to our Cogeco forum, the process isn’t going particularly smoothly for most customers, in part because the bandwidth usage monitor Cogeco is using doesn’t work.

Many users are getting e-mail alert notifications with consumption numbers that don’t match the consumption indicated in Cogeco’s online usage-tracking portal. Others aren’t seeing accurate amounts on either. Some aren’t having any bandwidth usage registered whatsoever. It looks like Cogeco hasn’t started billing yet which is good — given they wouldn’t know what they were billing for.

Source: DSL Reports :: Cogeco Metered Billing Goes Live, Confuses Customers

When I first switched to using Bell’s DSL service almost two years ago now I was paying $24.95 (and another $39.95 for regular phone service) for 5MB down. I am now paying just over $50.00 for the same service. My only other alternative where we live – Cogeco Cable.

Either way like many of the people in Canada I’m screwed either which way. Competition? It doesn’t exist outside of maybe the large metropolitan areas like Toronto, Montreal or Vancouver.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

You want to show support for those in Iran and show the power of Social Media? Here’s how

nada There’s been a lot of talk about the Iranian government and how they are – or aren’t – monitoring the Internet traffic in and out of the country. Well if the post on the Wall Street Journal by Christopher Rhoads and Loretta Chao is any indication the Iranian government has been getting some pretty high powered help.

Accord to the post the Iranian regime has developed one of the world’s most sophisticated mechanisms to enable it to monitor and censor the Internet – all on a massive scale.

The monitoring capability was provided, at least in part, by a joint venture of Siemens AG, the German conglomerate, and Nokia Corp., the Finnish cellphone company, in the second half of 2008, Ben Roome, a spokesman for the joint venture, confirmed.

Source: Wall Street Journal

So here we have two of the worlds biggest multi-national companies helping a repressive Iranian regime control the Internet flow in and out of the country.

The Iranian government had experimented with the equipment for brief periods in recent months, but it had not been used extensively, and therefore its capabilities weren’t fully displayed — until during the recent unrest, the Internet experts interviewed said.

“We didn’t know they could do this much,” said a network engineer in Tehran. “Now we know they have powerful things that allow them to do very complex tracking on the network.”

Deep-packet inspection involves inserting equipment into a flow of online data, from emails and Internet phone calls to images and messages on social-networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter. Every digitized packet of online data is deconstructed, examined for keywords and reconstructed within milliseconds. In Iran’s case, this is done for the entire country at a single choke point, according to networking engineers familiar with the country’s system.

Source: Wall Street Journal

Sure these two companies can hide conveniently behind the rhetoric that they only sold the equipment but as their own spokesman said

“If you sell networks, you also, intrinsically, sell the capability to intercept any communication that runs over them,” said Mr. Roome

Now there is nothing we can do directly to help the people in Iran right now other than try and keep what gateways they have open to the web via proxies. However the one thing that we can do is show companies like Nokia and Siemens that selling technology to countries that will even remotely use that technology against its people is unacceptable.

Corporations like these two only care about one thing and that is the dollar. So rather than whine and cry about how bad they are for assisting countries like Iran let them know by affecting their bottom line. Show them exactly what Social Media can do by exposing their financially driven duplicity everywhere possible.

If we can get so riled up over an inconsequential like the ‘Motrin Moms’ this kind of action by global corporations should be a rallying call that actually means something. It’s time to let companies like Nokia and Siemens that their responsibilities lie beyond that ‘sale’. They also have a social responsibility to make sure that their technology isn’t used to abuse people.

Or they are just as guilty as the person who killed a young woman in Iran today.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Post Redux: Job Opening – Internet Philosopher

As a result of moving to the new domain and blog identity I’ve been going through my old posts cleaning up URLs and tags. Through this process I’ve been finding posts that I really liked when I first wrote them and think that still apply at this point in time. So I have decided to repost them as part of a regular Sunday feature, well at least until I get all caught up.
At the bottom of the repost I will also update the original post with any new thoughts that I might have had since orginally publishing the selected post; along with any corrections that need to be made.

 

Rene DescartesThroughout our history we have always had people who stood apart, always looking past the surface to who we really were as a society and a people. Manyof those people put their thoughts to paper, thoughts which have affected the way we think and the way we live.

These philosophers were; and still are, the microscope by which we judge ourselves and our actions. Whether they be the deceptively simple thoughts of the Zen Buddhist masters, the social philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre or the futurist theory’s of Alvin Toffler these words and thoughts provide us with the mirror to look inward.

It is Toffler though who comes the closest to being a modern day philosopher who understands the incredible changes our society is going through. His book Powershift: Knowledge, Wealth and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century which he wrote with his wife in 1990 is probably the closest we come to what technology will bring to our world, our society.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Let’s all dump on social media and Twitter

Truck-Dumping It must be the weekend because much like my post earlier today everyone seems to be lining up to take some shots at social media and even bigger shots at Twitter. It’s not that these things might not deserve it especially when we find out we have ghosts in the machine but really it does get a little old after awhile.

I’ve had three posts from earlier today lined up all ready to shotgun together a nice little rant and then Mark “Rizzn” Hopkins had to go and ruin the flow – more on that in a bit. For now though I just want to take a look at two specific posts from this morning because in of themselves they were some pretty good smack down. First up is a post from Douglas Karr over at The Marketing Technology Blog and while I’m not use to Douglas going on a rant like this, it definitely went well with the morning coffee.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

The web is now about evolution rather than revolution

Toilet-Paper Sarah Lacy has been hanging out at TechCrunch this past month of February and while I wouldn’t suggest that she has changed the blog into a softer and gentler version of itself she has written a couple of interesting post during her stint there. One of them I kind of took a round out of over at the Inquisitr but her post today was a rather interesting one in that she questions whether if anything happening on the web is even close to be revolutionary.

As she points out

Already, if you think about Web 2.0, the successful companies are building off the technology that was pioneered before—whether it’s the browser, broadband, or the open source stack. Sites like YouTube and Twitter may be technically hard to scale, but are they really technical leaps in innovation, or more of a creative, cultural leap in how existing technology is being used?

Given how we love nothing better than to toss around words like game changing, paradigm shifting, revolutionary and world changing when the only real difference would be like going from single ply toilet paper to double ply, I have to wonder the same thing.

Sure there have been technological improvements as we move forward but when the desktop PC might have been a revolutionary move up from the mainframe era it doesn’t mean in the same breath that the GUI interface is really that much of a world changer from the commandline.

The same goes pretty much for the Web as well. Sure we might be making changes to the plumbing of how it works but really is Twitter at it’s root really that much different that IRC? Is what Facebook and other social networks doing really that much different than what AOL, CompuServe or Prodigy did in the past?

Is there even any way that the web could go through a revolutionary change considering the simplicity of rules and protocols that it was built on?

If we were to have a real revolutionary change or paradigm shift in computing what do you think it will look like?

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

The Internet we dream of will never be the Internet we get

minority report As an avid science fiction reader the one unifying thread of the future has been the idea that communication would be seamless and done without any real thought regardless of where you were or what you were doing. The Internet as it has grown and become more of a part of our daily lives it seemed to be the medium that all these sci-fi authors had written about. After all it was the Internet that allowed us to reach across the street or around the globe and be able to talk with anyone we chose.

We have reached that point where it really is technically feasible to do much of what sci-fi has foreseen; or it is pretty damn close. Even though we might marvel and drool at the technological imagery that movies like Minority Report puts on the screen the fact is that we are potentially at the doorstep of such marvels becoming common place.

The other predominate idea; especially as the Internet has grown, is that there will come a point when regardless of where we are; or what we are doing, we will be only fingertips away from the vast treasure trove of information we call the Internet. As well instant communication will be just that – instant.

Talk to any futurist or even early adopter and they will tell you how our society; and world, is changing – and will continue to change because of the ubiquitous connection we will all have to the Internet. We are being told of a rich future where we will be able to do or know anything we want because we are always just one step away from being on the Internet.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?