Shooting at Bubbles

taking joy in the popping of the social media bubble & other web 2.0 silliness

  • Home
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • About
Twitter Facebook RSS
Tag Archives: Google

Microsoft – the 10,000 pound chicken with its head cut off

Posted on February 4, 2008 by Steven Hodson
8 Comments

It's just a dumb idea from start to finish All evening I have being trying to come to grips with this whole Microsoft, Yahoo and Google thing. I’ve been reading and rereading the puff type posts and the equally well thought out posts on the events of the last couple of days. Everyone from MG Siegler with his two excellent posts on the matter, to Paul O’Flaherty who thinks Google is reacting out of fear and then to the typical Duncan Riley and Michael Arrington pieces on TechCrunch.

As interesting as all the posts I have read might be and as much as I might have learned bits and pieces from the different view points I am still left with one question. What the frak is the point of this deal. It makes absolutely no sense what so ever – none – nada. I don’t care what the spin is that Microsoft is trying to put around the whole deal. But then neither do I believe the crap that Google is spewing as to why this is a bad deal. The fact is the more they open their collective mouth the more they are beginning to sound like Sun, Netscape and a bunch of other companies from years ago that went crying to the government over some silly piece of software called a browser.

Let’s look at the players in this pending fiasco for a minute and try and make some sense of this. First of all we have the unwilling bride to be Yahoo who is looking more like a peanut butter sandwich that has fallen face down onto the floor and no matter how you pick it up there’s gonna be mess. Yahoo have become nothing more that a disparate collection of services that have the company spread all over the place. Yahoo seems to have become nothing more than a spaghetti throwing company and nothing is sticking long enough to form anything around.

As for Microsoft – well someone please take the crack pipe away from Ballmer and the sooner the better. Microsoft is already having enough of an identity crisis what with MSN this and Live that. This isn’t even taking into account the mess that the whole operating system division is in and now they are wanting to bring this whole SaaS stuff into the mix. At this point Google might be the 1,000 pound gorilla of the Internet but Microsoft is quickly beginning to resemble a 10,000 pound chicken with its head cut off – it doesn’t know which direction it wants to go.

As much as Microsoft might want to wish it was an Internet company it is nowhere near to being one – especially on the scale of Google, and no amount of billions is going to buy its way onto that dance card. So the idea of buying Yahoo as its entry fee into the Internet world is nonsensical to say the least. The very idea of having to mesh two totally different mind sets to operate as one huge entity should be enough to make the most sane man want to run and hide in a corner somewhere – if he doesn’t go screaming mad first.

Then we have Google circling the whole thing and watching for any opportunity to throw in a monkey wrench where ever it can. While Google might not have the resources themselves to do a deal against Microsoft it will be doing everything it can to make the process as difficult as possible. The last thing that Google wants is another player with deeper pockets playing in the sandbox of information that they have considered their exclusive property for so long.

Personally I can only think of one reason why this deal is going ahead and that is Steve Ballmer. To me this is his last great hurrah and he doesn’t care what the common wisdom is saying about how bad this deal could turn out to be. Ballmer wants his place in history and since Bill Gates has taken the all important places in history Ballmer is having to settle for second best.

Now whether that second best will be the successful purchase and meshing of two giant corporations or whether it will be the decline of the worlds greatest corporation into a morass of meaninglessness – well only history will tell us.

Tweet
Categories: Technology | Tags: Google, merger, Microsoft, Yahoo

Why bloggers relying on Google may not be a good idea

Posted on January 19, 2008 by Steven Hodson
4 Comments

Google and it's AdSense program. A while back I wrote a post called So why does Google get a free ride…. which got a really interesting rebuttal post from Mark ‘Rizzn’ Hopkins over at Mashable in which he came to the conclusion that Google doesn’t really have what could be classified as a monopoly in the classic sense of the word.

In his well written rebuttal of my original post he said:

The bottom line is, though, where Google dominates markets is not where a product or service is being sold. Take search, for example. Search is not the product – you and your search queries are the product. Those, in turn, are sold to the advertisers. In the world of advertising (or even the world of online advertising), Google is not the sole competitor. There are many other very strong competitors in online advertising. While Google does own a significant portion (or even majority share) of a certain types of the online advertising market, it in no way can be called a monopoly.

On the face of his argument Mark is quite right however a recent piece by Chrispian on his blog Nothing to Say once more brings the whole subject of the power held by Google and whether they are using that power to manipulate the marketplace to their advantage – hence a monopoly albeit not necessary a monopoly in the typical sense of one.

In his post – Does Google Hate Webmasters – Chrispian outlines some of the things that Google has done recently that has had – in some cases some profound effects on bloggers:

Here is some of the shenangins Google has pulled lately:

- Link exchanges are bad
- Directories that link directly to you are bad
- Buying links is bad
- Selling links is bad
- Selling ads that directly link to the buyer’s site is bad
- Giving away a program, plugin, theme or software that requires a “link” is bad

And the list goes on and on. I’m not the only one that feels this way.

The simple fact is that Google with one simple statement and change to their code can literally wipe out revenue streams for bloggers. Yes there are a massive number of blogs; or splogs, out there that use every trick they can to play with Google and make loads of money in the process. While those types of operations definitely need to be brought to heel there are an equal number of blogs; if not more, who legitimately do the best they can to follow the ever changing rule book.

Google is the acknowledged leader in online advertising with its AdSense program driving probably 99.99% of all blogs out there. If Google sneezes we all catch a cold and nothing is changing that fact at this time. For blogs that are trying to monetize their work AdSense is pretty well the only game in town regardless of the number of competing ad networks that are out there.

Sure there are other networks out there like I said but for the vast majority of blogs they are in-effectual either because those networks don’t want to deal with small pageview blogs or they don’t produce a reliable amount of revenue. Whereas AdSense is the defacto standard for just about every blog that wants to run ads and Google knows that – we are a trapped customers with absolutely now alternatives or voice in how Google applies its AdSense rules.

That to me still smells of a monopoly .. even if it is only a monopoly due to circumstances.

Tweet
Categories: Technology | Tags: AdSense, advertising, blogging, blogs, Google

Slide rule, Calculator, Google and Lazy Thinking

Posted on January 14, 2008 by Steven Hodson
12 Comments

sliderule

For those who might not recognize the above ancient artifact it is what is called a slide ruler rule and for those of us that do retain terrified memories of having to learn how to use this precursor to the calculator it was our constant companion as we journeyed through the halls of education.

My introduction to this mind numbing hunk of wood came at a time when calculators where almost the size of small notebooks and were being frowned upon by math and science teachers everywhere. As their size got smaller their acceptance grew from being banned in test halls to being a required item by even the earliest school grades; but that didn’t change the feeling among teachers that the widening acceptance of things like calculators were carrying a hidden cost.

It is this hidden cost that once again raising its head; as it seems to lately every couple of months, as teachers in all education levels are becoming more vocal in their feeling that Internet institutions like Google and Wikipedia also carry this hidden cost as they are being used by more and more students.

Before looking at what this hidden cost could be we have to try and remember what education is about in the first place. The argument that the education establishment has tried to push is that education’s main purpose is to ready all those young minds for the real world that is ahead of them. As much as that argument is a complete fallacy teachers themselves know that the real purpose of education is to train us to think, to be able to cognitively link ideas, to express thoughts and back up those thoughts with logical processes. Education is all about stretching one’s abilities to think, imagine and express concepts and ideas.

Sure learning multiplication tables may not seem all that important on the surface, learning the periodic tables may seem mundane and grasping the social implications held within Hamlet may seem useless but the value is not in the act of doing those things. The value comes from making us reach beyond the act and gets us to reason the process of getting to the end product.

This brings us back to the hidden cost that things like slide rulers, calculators and Google have on education. As Professor Tara Brabazon was quoted by Andy Chiles in a post today:

Professor Tara Brabazon, from the University of Brighton, said too many young people around the world were taking the easy option when asked to do research and simply repeating the first things they found on internet searches.

This of course had Robert Scoble pass along his words of wisdom on the matter:

If I were a professor and I wanted my students to go deeper than “first level Google searches” I’d just grade tougher. Really, is it any more difficult than that? Geesh.

Well gee Robert that is really insightful except that you are forgetting one basic fact about human nature – we’re lazy. If we are given the choice to use a simple answer that has been provided for us or to actually use our brains and think through to a better answer 99.999% of people will always take the easier route.

We have become lazy thinkers and this can be seen from the way we read; or watch, our news right through to how we communicate with each other. Whether it be wanting to watch 4 minute YouTube clips over Robert’s 60 minute in-depth interviews to the bastardization of the English language that we see on the Internet if there is an easier, quicker way to do something that is the path that will be taken.

Do I think that banning things like Google and Wikipedia from the halls of education is the answer – no because that is again taking the lazy way out of the problem. As much as I might agree with teachers like Professor Brabazon that:

… young people were finishing education with shallow ideas and needed to learn interpretative skills before starting to use technology.

I don’t think that Robert’s solution of “grading tougher” is the answer either because I don’t think that as much as teachers want to provide their students with a true education the system doesn’t let them. Like the rest of the world the institution of education has become just as lazy where it is easier to go with the flow than it is to challenge.

(Note: as was kindly pointed out to this old fart it should be slide rule not slide ruler – correction has been made :) )


Tweet
Categories: Technology | Tags: education, Google, Wikipedia

Just because they say it’s big doesn’t make it so

Posted on January 8, 2008 by Steven Hodson
Comments off

What's in it for this guy - to give up their golden goose So … what’s the big news of the day and one that is bound to keep the pundit yammering for days to come and no it wasn’t Steve Rubel’s calling us the lazysphere.

Nope .. it all has to do with Google, Plaxo … and are you ready … are you sitting down … yes and Facebook coming together to join the DataPortability Workgroup.

*YAWN*

Of course just about everyone is jumping on the bandwagon on how this is going to be a universal breakthrough that will return ownership of our data to … us. Gee this almost makes me feel as warm and fuzzy as when Time magazine declared it the Year of You not so long ago.

In the years that I have been a part of the computer industry and the information industry that grew around it I have seen more mind blowing agreements come and go that I could wallpaper my office three times over. It usually turned out that the press generated did nothing more than give those getting excited about something to write about.

The thing that gets me about this one is some simple facts. First off neither Google nor Plaxo have anything to gain or lose by climbing on the bandwagon other than it gives Google a easy way for Open API to disappear without a whimper being raised. As far as Plaxo is concerned it just enhances their salability which apparently is their prime concern at the moment.

The curiosity of this triad has to be Facebook because other than getting some heat taken off of it there is no upside. If anything they do this they are giving away the one thing that makes them valuable – their user database. It is this golden egg that gives Facebook any value at all. Without that trump card they are no different than any other social network out there.

But really – beyond all the hype that has predominated Techmeme what is being done that will see any solid changes. If you take what Duncan Riley says on TechCrunch this whole thing is nothing more than a bunch of guys getting together to yammer on about a best practices design paper:

I spoke with the head of the DataPortability Group Chris Saad prior to this post (Chris is also the CEO of Faraday Media.) After about 24 hours of correspondence, the following are to join the working group as official representatives of their respective companies: Joseph Smarr (Plaxo), Brad Fitzpatrick (Google) and Benjamin Ling (Facebook).

The DataPortability Workgroup is actively working to create the ‘DataPortability Reference Design’ to document the best practices for integrating existing open standards and protocols for maximum interoperability (and here’s the key area) to allow users to access their friends and media across all the applications, social networking sites and widgets that implement the design into their systems.

In other words yak yak yak with no guarantee that anything of real substance will come of all the yakking. Even though Marshall Kirkpatrick of ReadWriteWeb thinks this is a bombshell and Mathew Ingram thinks the whole shebang is huge I just have to think of the graphic done for Che Scoble and have a good chuckle.

Until; or if, some real substances comes out of this hot air I’ll sit on the sidelines and have a nap.


Tweet
Categories: Technology | Tags: Data Portability Group, Facebook, Google, hot air, Plaxo
Page 30 of 46« First«...1020...2829303132...40...»Last »
  • Search posts

  • Advertising

  • Post Categories

    • Odds & Ends (600)
    • Opinion (26)
    • Podcasts (319)
    • Social (10)
    • Technology (1615)
    • Video (4)
  • Follow Me…

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail
  • Follow me on Google+

    Couldn't get data from google+
  • Advertising

  • Recent Posts

    • Lazy OEMs equal crap systems – thanks for nothing
    • Doing the dog paddle to the future
    • Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • If you are using a ghostwriter on Twitter you don’t have a clue about social media
    • Another note about this “real name” nonsense
  • Recent Comments

    • John E. Bredehoft on Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • Top Ten Social Media Articles and Tweets of the Day | Michael Blogs on Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • links for 2011-09-26 | Netweb on Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • Leigh on If you are using a ghostwriter on Twitter you don’t have a clue about social media
    • John E. Bredehoft on Be afraid, very afraid because for some reason someone thinks I am an influencer
    • Be afraid, very afraid because for some reason someone thinks I am an influencer | Shooting at Bubbles on Are you ready for a hot new buzz phrase?
    • Rene on Google+ moron moment – no it won’t replace your blog
    • Brett Nordquist on Google+ moron moment – no it won’t replace your blog
© Shooting at Bubbles. Proudly Powered by WordPress | Nest Theme by YChong