Posts with tag "DRM"

Pipeline:Knowing What’s In It For You

Just a bit of a note about what I use to to call From The Pipeline posts which I tried to do every night with stuff that I had found during the day on FriendFeed. I’ve decided to revamp the idea to be more of a short form blog post with snippets of thoughts about other blogger’s posts that I have read during the day. I am doing this because I began to feel that just doing one line link type posts of things already on FriendFeed was narrowing my focus too much. This way posts that I have read that don’t really spark a full post treatment because of what they are talking about can still be passed as something still worth you having a read and why I might think so. Hopefully this will widen the perspective of things to talk about rather than just repeating links which really doesn’t expand the conversation. So with that here we go ……

This one is a little bit old; if you count a couple of days as being old, but this post from Mark Evans is still one that I have flagged to think about further because he raises some really good points in it. In the post Marks asks what is really a deceptively simple question – What’s In It For Me? - which is directed at social media and Web 2.0 developers.

It is actually a two pronged question that suggests that developers need to really look at their products from the user’s perspective and be willing to admit that the idea really might not be all that terrific. I’m still thinking about this idea.

 

Just in time for the weekend Jason Calacanis’ non blog email got posted to several blogs and Alan Patrick over at BroadStuff gives it the reality check it deserves. I tried reading it – really I did but gave up after the third or fourth paragraph. Alan notes in an update that the original post has been pulled from Silicon Valley Insider which he says wasn’t really that bad.

 

Paul Glazowski over at Mashable had a post about how Lawrence Lessig of Creative Commons fame has a book available via Amazon’s Kindle storefront. Besides the obvious humour of a free book on Lessig’s site being made available as a paid download there’s the matter of the Kindle DRM that’s a part of downloading books. Anyone else get the rib tickler here?

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

So, This Is What You Get For Being Honest

While those bastions of the music and video entertainment continue to pursue both locking down their products with draconian methods and letting their various lobbying trade associations practice being SWAT teams, the people who try to be honest are getting royally screwed. EA is using SecurROM as part of the security measures for their newest game Spore which is leading them into a SonyBMG like class action lawsuit. Each of the major players with online music stores that have been blessed by the music industry each have their own DRM methods of locking down something you have tried to be honest and pay for.

The problem is that by trying to play the game and be honest, you are leaving yourself open to being ripped off in some fashion or another. This isn’t even taking into account the various methods used to maximize entertainment industry profits by geotarding online services like Pandora or even the industry’s own glowing example of technology being done right – NBC’s Hulu. Because the entertainment is acting more like a modern day protection racket, people who are more than willing to pay for services are being told to go away. In the case of Pandora; an online music recommendation service, everyone from the RIAA and music labels wanted to close it down. Even though those parties appeared to come to some sort of agreement that would let Pandora live another day it appears now that yet another trade association is trying to torpedo the agreement.

For gamers it typically has been a case of addon security measures that are provided by third party companies and included as part of most game installs. While this has meant anything from something as simple as entering in a serial key during the install or making sure that the game CD is handy at all times in case the game is coded to run checks these methods have really been nothing more than a minor pain in the ass. Typically as soon as a game is release in no short order you can find a crack or a no-cd solution online. So while most game producers have been satisfied with this type of solution there is the chance that as more producers move to online distribution they might also look to similar DRM measures as employed by the music industry.

What happens however; as is being seen with the online music DRM, is one day the game suppliers; or third party DRM verification providers decide to shutdown those DRM verifying servers. As Tiktaaklik said today on the NeoGAF web forums (a video game industry discussion community)

Why does this matter and why is it posted in the games forum? Well the games industry is currently massively moving toward downloadable content, and while this movement is 100% necessary and has had a huge positive impact on gamers, providing us with games such as Braid and Castle Crashers which would not otherwise been financially viable, there has been little thought toward the long term implications of this.

Wii owners that have had their systems bricked will attest to the fact that it can be a huge pain and inconvenience to get their games they’ve downloaded back, and you really have to wonder how long will Microsoft and Sony support their respective networks and games. Will there be some future where it is literally impossible to play Braid or CastleCrashers or PixelJunk Monsters?

Thanks to console rom dumpers nearly the entirety of gaming history is available to us. With a little searching for example, you can easily find and download the entire Famicom disk system library (it’s about 10MB worth of data) which is genuinely a smart thing to do, considering that the hardware itself is notoriously failure prone. Hold your replies for a minute, we’re not talking about piracy, at this point I’m just talking about basic historical preservation.

So I’m wondering, how about our new era of downloadable games. As the above article shows one could easily see a future where XBL is simply turned off. Will gamers resort to buying used Xbox 360 harddrives in the hope that there is a Castle Crashers on there?

We’ve already seen games disappear. Metal Gear Solid 3′s online component was turned off by Konami after a very short time, and while it’s been replaced by the similar MGS4 online, the fact exists that you can now never play MGS3 online ever again. With online PC games hackers have frequently created ways to host their own servers and so online games will be able to exist long after their companies stopped supporting them, but online console games? I’m not sure.

After all, this is something that has hit the online music buying customer already with companies like Yahoo and Microsoft announcing that their DRM verifying servers were going to be taken down; effectively rendering all the music bought through them as being dead in the water. While both companies had to relent to public pressure over the move they did it in different ways. Yahoo on the one hand basically recommended that you pirate the music you already paid for; or take the offered replacement value coupons from RealNetworks Rhapsody service, while Microsoft has postponed the shutdown until around 2011.

Now today we hear that Wal*Mart will also be shutting down their own DRM verifying servers and like Yahoo one of their recommended ways of not losing all that music you paid for is to burn them to CD – after which of course you can rip back to your hard drive but that makes you a criminal

If you have purchased protected WMA music files from our site prior to Feb 2008, we strongly recommend that you back up your songs by burning them to a recordable audio CD. By backing up your songs, you will be able to access them from any personal computer. This change does not impact songs or albums purchased after Feb 2008, as those are DRM-free.

[you can read the whole email from Wal*Mart on Boing Boing]

If you think that this isn’t something that won’t affect video then think again because it has already happened with Google Video back in August 2007

Google sent an email to anyone who purchased or rented digital videos on Google Video explaining, in a nutshell, that the service will be shut down and that videos will no longer be viewable.  Google initially offered affected users up to US $10 in credit for use on its affiliated e-commerce sites, but only if the user purchases at least that amount, and only for 60 days.  The ensuing wave of backlash induced Google to change its story: it is now extending the life of the service another six months (though not allowing further purchases) and offering full refunds in addition to the $10 credits.

It doesn’t matter where you look when it comes to buying your entertainment online there will always be a chance that at some point you could end up being screwed and forced into pirating the stuff you have already paid for – either  that or buy it all over again. Sure there are an increasing number of DRM free music stores but that isn’t going to help the people who have already been sucked into the DRM black hole. Along with that the whole idea of DRM isn’t going away any time soon and as soon as they can find a more palatable implementation it will come back and we will be playing this whole senerio over again.

As far as I am concerned until four simple things are agreed to the entertainment industry can go screw themselves. Those things are

  1. Absolutely no DRM on any products bought from the web or built into the computers or system software that we use.
  2. Equality in payment methods for these goods – not everyone in the damn world has a damn credit card.
  3. Stop with the stupid ass geotarding of services on the web – get a clue you industry idiots the web is global. The game has changed so grow up – catch up – and geotarding services is just another way to turn us into pirates
  4. Once I have paid for something – piss off. I should be able to do whatever I like with that product. Just because it is digital goods doesn’t give you any special rights on how I want to use that product; or service.

DRM means Digital Rights Management – the only problem is that it is the person who is paying money for those products whose rights are getting pissed on and being made into criminals. Except the real crooks are the people trying to sell us products and then tell us that it’s not really ours after all.

Enough already.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

From the Pipeline – 9.8.08

Nothing like having to file legal papers and call the health board on one’s landlord especially when you consider that they have 654 rental units spread over 3 towns. you think that they’d treat their tenants better but I guess when you are making at least a million dollars a year profit you don’t need to. It really sucks being treated like less than second class citizen especially when your options are extremely limited. On the up side though I’ve found a bunch of good things to share with you from today’s FriendFeed pipeline.

Amazon reviewers clobber Spore DRM :: Boing Boing – an interesting thought from the post is that maybe the negative points being given out by reviewers on Amazon may not be about the game itself but more as a statement against DRM.

Declaring love boosts sex appeal :: BBC News – I only have one thing to say on this – Well DUH! .. and this they got tons of money – wow.

Rumor: Will Smith Cast as Captain America?! :: First Showing – yes this is strictly a RUMOUR .. but a fun one all the same.

Why it’s wrong to blame student unions for freshers’ week binge-drinking :: Guardian – I don’t imagine they would be being blamed because the student unions are the ones in control of the drunken parties

Play With Spider :: Play With Spider – like the title says – Play with the spider

20 Very Strange Endangered Animal Species :: Web Ecoist – some of them might strange looking but they are also pretty cute … the rest – well their just f*@ked up.

Dome Housing: The Shire Is Real :: Gear Fuse – oh man I want one of these so much and I blame my mother for letting me read Mother Earth News and the Whole Earth Catalogue when I was kid.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

My most anticipated Vista hotfix

No DRM bullshit for the consumer ParisLemon has a post today about how Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails is following along on the heels of Radiohead in the move away from music industry labels as the major providers of our music listening displeasure. With both bands making very large noises about how they are now in control of how their music will be made available to us the consumer changes are definitely coming.

On top of that is a post by Nat Torkington over at O’Reilly Radar where he points to a speech by Ian Rogers of Yahoo! Music who has basically come out and told the music industry that Yahoo! Music is no longer going to inconvenience their users with a crippled music delivery system that until now has been mandated by the music labels and their lapdogs the RIAA.

This movement that finally is gaining steam; albeit for the moment only within the music industry, is that acceptance that DRM (Digital Rights Management) is a fucked model and while treating the real consumers like criminals isn’t doing a damn thing to stem the flow of real criminal based piracy of digital goods.

Even though there are a lot of people out there who would suggest that this whole DRM thing could be buried for good with one simple step – iTunes stops supporting DRM crippled music sales. In my own opinion that is as about as like to happen as His Jobness porting OS/X to run on my PC base hardware. A nice dream but neither is likely to happen.

What could potentially provide the death knell for any DRM based system; whether it be music or video, would be Microsoft getting a backbone and stepping up to the plate saying enough of this DRM crap. Our customers and their ease of use of all our software is of prime importance and as such starting with the next hotfix releases we will be removing any and all code that supports any DRM models from Vista.

While this probably not happen until the consumer backlash is so large as to really threaten Microsoft’s core business the effects of removing DRM support in Vista would be immediate and felt right across the entire spectrum of our computer entertainment. For those companies that whine and cry about how this move would destroy their business especially gaming companies with their convoluted range of piracy inducing protection methods (just another form of DRM) I would point you to Stardock and their games of which none are crippled in any way.

Microsoft could probably have the greatest impact of any software company in our current climate of consumers being treated like criminals by totally rethinking their WGA methodology and inclusions of DRM on the base code level but that would take guts.

But it would still be a hellva hotfix to see at Windows Update … Remove DRM Hotfix ….


Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Off the Cuff: being given the gears & stuff

Gears for everyone A whole lotta press is being given to the new frontier that is Google Gears and getting your on-line browser trapped applications to work offline. Through all this gushing comes a voice of reason that suggests we’re just exchanging one set of problems for another. In a post yesterday Dare Obasanjo skillfully points out some of the inherent problems faced by Google Gears. Myself .. I think it’s sounding to be more trouble than it’s worth but then I’m just a cranky throwback.

mailbox_lock_48 I see that Walt Mossberg today came out saying that the new Windows Live Mail, not to be confused with Windows Mail or Windows Live Mail Desktop, is a worthy heir to the outdated Outlook Express. Tell you what Walt … wait until you have to backup your settings and data. This new incarnation of the simple email client might look pretty and all that but it still sucks with its identity based data storage and can still cause tremors of fear when it comes time to backup or restore your stuff. Me … I’m sticking with InScribe with its simple one folder copy and paste backup and restore .. and even move to a new machine.

music-cd_128x128 Ah the ol’ DRM shell game is still in play over at LaLa by the sounds on the news item from TechDirt. Here LaLa was hoping to make big brownie points with the public by announcing the availability of DRM free songs. As Mike at TechDirt reports a fellow blogger; Bob Lefsetz, has found out that in fact the supposed DRM free tracks do in fact have … ready? … DRM. It’s just a DRM of a different stripe so we’re told.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Stopping DRM could be real easy

A shell game we all lose at It is a pretty well acknowledged fact that the majority of tech oriented folks have a profound dislike for DRM (Digital Rights Management) and ballyhoo it as a waste of time; not mention a technology that makes users feel like criminals due to the corporate reliance on it to protect their turf and pocketbooks.

It is a technology that enables media corporations – probably the most technophobic of all types of companies – to try and build a wall around their business model and forces technology users to either use crippled machines and software in order to comply with this archaic method of control, or to break the law on a continual basis.

DRM continues to be used because the majority of computer users don’t have the first clue as to what DRM is. About the only time they come up against it is when some song title or video won’t play or they can’t copy it to watch on another system of their choice. At times like this it’s not the music or video file they’ll blame but the computer or software that they’ll blame. Microsoft or some other OS of choice get’s the blame, the software developer who has to play within the boundaries of specifications get cursed at.

The media companies may want to play a shell game of semantics by changing the name of the technology they use to guard the gates of their fortunes but it doesn’t change the fact that at the core it isn’t the computer manufactures or software developer’s fault when things go wrong.

It is their fault however for allowing this use of DRM to continue. All of the major OS vendors and hardware manufacturers seem to be under the illusion that without bowing to the pressure of the media industry and implementing a flawed technology that they’ll be out of business or at least severely hampered.

What they don’t realize is that they are dealing with an industry that is built on illusions and the thought that the technology industry would fade away to nothingness if it doesn’t comply with DRM; or any other shell game name they want to it, is just another illusion.

If tomorrow every single technology manufacturer and major software OS vendor stood up and said DRM is dead, DRM is making criminals out of our customers and is wrong what do you think would happen in the long run?

Nothing, other than the fact that the media companies would finally be forced kicking and screaming into the modern world.

However there is one important ingredient missing to this scenario and that is consumer backbone. We, in the tech influencer world especially, whine and cry about DRM and bemoan backhandedly acts of DRM cracking but the moment a new toy comes out we are the first to line up to buy crippled products. Whether it be hardware or software we just have to be the first on the block to use it.

So while hardware and software manufacturers may be to blame for allowing DRM to infect our lives we are as equally to blame for allowing it to continue. Companies like Microsoft or Apple won’t enter into a battle with the media corporations if they don’t have to. Companies will always take the path of least resistance to make their money; but if the source of that money is threatened in any fashion DRM would be history.

It’s not like we don’t have any power over the situation, it’s not like our voices aren’t heard – the recent incident of digg.com and a certain integer is a good example of that. Instead what we get is dribbling’s of discontent from the tech blogging world and tech press in general. We can’t expect profit driven corporations to have a backbone if we the consumers keep cutting them off at the knees which we do with every purchase of DRM infected media, software and hardware.

Microsoft and Apple alone could stop DRM but as long as we vote yes to DRM with our wallets this is one fight they won’t take on.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

When Jobs speaks everything else is white noise

Cool - the more I talk the less they notice I'm saying nothing I got a really late start today with my daily reading of the news but the first thing that struck me was the proliferation of posts around the b’sphere talking about the Mighty Steve Jobs statement from the mount about DRM.

It didn’t matter where you looked someone had something to say about his supposed appeal to the recording bloodsuckers industry to stop wanting music being wrapped in DRM lockboxes. While the majority of posts heralded this as the ultimate word that Jobs was against DRM some were a little more sensible about it.

After all this was nothing more than an excellently executed Jobs PR move that really does nothing but pass the responsibility of DRM back on to the the music industry which he conviently pointed back to as being owned by European companies.

Jobs doesn’t give a damn really whether music is hobbled by DRM or not – either way he still gets his slice if the iPod/iTunes pie. This was a move to toss the ball back in the EU countries that are trying to sue Apple to remove existing DRM restrictions.

It’s the ol’ “I would love to guys but it’s not within my control” type of spiel that he hopes will get him off the hook. In the meantime the b’sphere and MSM press is heralding him as the new Anti-DRM god and if anything else of importance happened on the web today it was lost in the white noise of JobsSpeak.

Personally I think the best post out there today on this was from Chris Pirillo (I can’ believe I said that :) )

From around the b’sphere:

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Seagate walking a fine line with new drives

For the better part of a year Seagate has been working hard on enabling full encryption at the hardware level; which they announced today will become available as DriveTrust on their Momentus line of drives. On the surface given the seeming inability of companies and government to maintain any semblance of information security this harddrive encryption would appear to be an excellent idea.

What they aren’t telling you though; or at least not in plain language, is that this DriveTrust hardware platform also enables hard-wired digital rights management at the hardware level. Which means in no simple terms that the hardware will be able to override the OS level commands in regards to what files can be written, when they can be written and where they can be written. to quote the BetaNews article on this:

Key to the success of Seagate’s architecture will be the integrity of the chain of communication between the TPM module on the PC — upon whose existence DriveTrust will depend — and the TPM on the hard drive (HDD). With the hard disk drive itself being one of the most closed systems in a computer assembly, it becomes relatively easier to secure the chain of communication between the CPU and HDD using hardware-based authentication. This disables any third party or unauthorized device from siphoning off portions of the bit stream, whether using hardware or software.

This kind of copying is a concern to content providers, including movie studios, that have to date been reluctant to throw their support behind any form of digital content recording system, until it can prove itself impenetrable to incursion for the purpose of making surreptitious copies.

So in effect you will no longer be able to control what is written to your harddrives. That decsion is going to be entirely up to themedia moguls and/or software companies.

This whole things makes a complete joke of personal computing.

Full Article on BetaNews

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?