Shooting at Bubbles

taking joy in the popping of the social media bubble & other web 2.0 silliness

  • Home
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • About
Twitter Facebook RSS
Tag Archives: Dave Winer

Adding TechJunk as one of my always open tabs

Posted on July 4, 2008 by Steven Hodson
5 comments

Dave Winer's TechJunk news aggregator Not too long ago Dave Winer came out with a new service for parsing what was hot and fresh in the political news stream and called it NewsJunk. Well it turns out that he wasn’t satisfied with just serving up political stuff as he also had a bitch about how tech related product release news was being passed over by the other major aggregating services. So this morning we were introduced to the TechJunk version [nw] of NewsJunk; which sported the same plain jane user interface.

Now I might not be the biggest Dave Winer fan out there but I will say that this project of his could very well fill a need for news junkies like myself. With its simple see everything new at a glance look TechJunk can sit quietly in the background updating with the newest product related news that is happening out there. While I do wish it had an auto refresh I will probably be having it as another of my permanently open browser tabs in FeedDemon along with FriendFeed.

Good job Dave.

TechJunk Page [nw]

Tweet
Categories: Technology | Tags: Dave Winer, news, TechJunk, Technology

Please Gabe don’t listen to Dave

Posted on June 29, 2008 by Steven Hodson
9 comments

Dave Winer One has to wonder sometimes what exactly goes through the minds of some smart people. One minute they can be saying completely intelligible things that have us in awe of their lucid thoughts and the next they sound like they couldn’t connect the dots if their lives depended on it. Sometimes the disconnect is so painfully obvious that you just sit there scratching your head and wondering WTF were they thinking of. Other times you stop for a second and think maybe – just maybe they are having fun with you and forgot to smirk or something before realizing that no they really have made absolutely no sense whatsoever.

A case in point is a conversation that was started yesterday on FriendFeed by Dave Winer where he decided it was time once again to revitalized the same old Techmeme bitchmeme – well it was the weekend after all so what else is there to do eh. Anyway his opening salvo to get everything started was this gem

“Ever notice how new products almost never make it on TechMeme these days. They don’t even appear. This is loop back to why I started blogging. The industry press was ignoring the interesting stuff and only paying attention to what the BigCos were doing. Time for a new route-around coming soon?”

Which was followed shortly afterwards with this mish mash of words

I don’t feel a need to reinvent the web inside of FF. However it is part of what I do, in the same way Twitter is. I like FF better, but only marginally better. It’s very far from the ideal. None of these guys have managed to combine all the elements the way plain old HTML does it so well. It’s nice in some ways but a big step backward in others

When I read the second one I had to stop for a minute and double check exactly what the starting point of this conversation was because this was something that looked like it had staggered in from left field like a bad drunk. Besides the fact that it had absolutely nothing to do with the supposed conversation at hand it didn’t even make sense as a standalone piece of text. Well maybe it did in a Steve Gillmor on TechCrunch sort of way but not here that is for sure.

Even when Louis Gray pointed out that Techmeme did indeed show representation to startups if they were good enough; or bad enough, to garner attention from the blogosphere Dave couldn’t resist showing his me-ism again.

Louis:

Dave: I disagree to a point. If you look at Techmeme stories from my blog in May and June alone, you can see stories on Loud3r, Feedly, Disqus, Sezwho, FFToGo, and Shyftr, for example. It could be that Techmeme is accurately monitoring the most discussed blogs, and that the vast majority of these blogs are talking less about new products.

Dave:

Louis — that’s kind of the point — those products didn’t launch well, and with no slight to you — I haven’t heard of them because I depend on TechMeme to tell me what’s important in the tech world. TechMeme does what it does well, but it has some real limits and the industry has shaped around those limits, just as the industry shaped around the limits of the press in the pre-Internet era and during the browser and Java wars in the 90s

The point here is that Louis pointed out some valid cases where Techmeme did do what it was programmed to do and as result those startups mentioned by Louis did make onto Techmeme. Just because Dave didn’t see them doesn’t mean that it didn’t happen – or does it? How anyone could have missed the dust up that hit everywhere; Techmeme included, over Shyftr is beyond me but Dave seems to which should make the Shyftr team pretty happy since that means all that negative discussion over their service never happened.

Now I’m not a big user of Techmeme but I do drop by the site at least three or four times a week when I’m bored and there is nothing else to read but I have seen plenty of product announcement or at least product launches being talked about by bloggers. Whether it has been Adobe AIR or another one of those minor little programs like Vista right through to NoiseRiver if it is being talked about in the blogosphere it shows up on Techmeme. Mind you this might not be the same blogosphere that Dave wanders around in but it seems to work for the rest of us just fine.

Is Techmeme perfect – probably not but what it was designed for it does a great job even if at times it seems to be more of an echo chamber. That isn’t the fault of Techmeme though. If any blame is to be passed around for that it is the bloggers with nothing of value to add other than practicing their cut ‘n paste skills. Sure there are things we all would like service like Techmeme to do especially if it means we get more eyeballs out of it but that doesn’t mean that the service needs to be screwed with.

Could Techmeme be expanded up by giving us more segments of the tech blogosphere as individual memes – probably but chances are that even then some wouldn’t be happy. I do give Gabe credit though for at least listening and trying to figure out the best way to try and keep everyone happy but the fact is he won’t be able to.

In the end it boils down to this – Gabe you keep doing what you are doing. Tweak Techmeme where you think it needs it and add where you think it will best serve your brand and the community but think twice about listening to people who are probably just pissed because their products didn’t get enough Techmeme time.

Tweet
Categories: Technology | Tags: Dave Winer, Gabe Rivera, Techmeme

Twitter: IRC with a new shade of lipstick

Posted on May 5, 2008 by Steven Hodson
15 comments

twitter_bird There is no denying that Twitter is the darling of Web 2.0 that as I pointed out yesterday is doing some heavy petting with the mainstream. Even though in a previous post where I questioned its ability to go mainstream I have come to realize that it really is sitting on the fence to major acceptance. The problem is that Twitter has an ongoing dance with instability as it is as well known as the service itself. This had lead to many discussions regarding how best to deal with this stability problem.

Whether it is Dave Winer who suggests that the data is the most important and should be decentralized or whether it is Scott Hanselman who is calling for an open Twitter like service that isn’t tied to one service. Then we have Hank Williams from the Why Does Everything Suck blog suggesting that Twitter as a company could go down the tubes if something like an open Twitter clone that uses the Twitter API gains momentum. Mathew Ingram uses Hank’s post along with the TechCrunch post on the matter as his way to question whether Twitter needs to be fixed or not.

As important as this whole idea of decentralizing Twitter seems to be to the Web 2.0 movers and shakers it only shows me that as we continue to use the service and have this conversation about decentralizing the service that is really is no different than the IRC (Internet Relay Chat) we have been using since long before the Internet. After all IRC is by its very nature is a decentralized communication service with IRC networks held together by servers around the world. Unless it is like a private IRC server such as the one I have run in the past most major IRC networks are multiple systems so that if one goes down there is another to switch to most of the time automatically (Netsplit anyone?).

Twitter & IRC - click for larger view

The fact is that when you really get down to brass tacks Twitter is nothing more than a dumbed down pretty interface than what IRC is. Where Twitter has three different types of communication channels so does IRC. If we take a look at similarities between the two we can really see that there is no difference between the two types of service other than the fact that Twitter is limited to what happens with the Twitterverse; whereas IRC is a completely open ended system.

The only thing that Twitter has done is moved the concept of IRC to an easily beautified user interface of HTML. This becomes doubly apparent with everyone talking about how Twitter needs to be decentralized. I guess this is one reason why I find it hard to become enamored with Twitter because it isn’t doing anything really new with communications. Whether or not decentralization of the service ever comes about I don’t know but whatever Twitter does; as well as the people involved with the Twitterverse that has developed around it, all they are doing is re-inventing something that has come before.

Sure sometimes re-inventing does make improvements and I guess that after a fashion Twitter has in effect made IRC something that is less arcane but I think that there is a much simpler solution for those folks who want to decentralize Twitter. All you would need is some clever developers to sit back and changed the IRC interface to one that is totally plain English rather than its current geek speak.

So what these folks like Dave Winer, Marc Canter and Michael Arrington would like to see happen to Twitter already exists it just needs some clever people to extend or add to it along with making the interface understandable and useable by regular folk. No need to re-invent the wheel once again – just improve it.

Tweet
Categories: Technology | Tags: Dave Winer, irc, Marc Canter, Mathew Ingram, Michael Arrington, Twitter

Dave – you are a pompous ass

Posted on April 21, 2008 by Steven Hodson
41 comments

Dave Winer This post has kinda been stewing since I first Dave Winer’s post yesterday where he first preformed a drive-by character assassination without being man enough to use the real names of those involved (for the record it was about Gabe Rivera and Michael Arrington) and then went on to generally berate everyone who takes up the challenge to write down their thoughts on a daily basis about technology.

As far as Dave is concerned that unless you have taken computer science or have written code you should keep your mouth shut. Screw you Dave – I have taken courses and I have written code and I have never found that either of those two things have had any impact whatsoever on what I write about. Just because someone hasn’t written code doesn’t mean they don’t have valid viewpoints about Web 2.0, social networks or even whether a browser looks and acts like a piece of shit.

I’m sorry but this post was even more of linkbait in my opinion that the TechCrunch post you turned your pompous nose up at. As Frederic at The Last Podcast said in his post on this

But here is why I think this doesn’t make sense: technology isn’t just about code, it’s about users and enabling users (and doesn’t that sound like something Dave would say himself?). Those users can (and should) happily write about their experiences and I for one am glad Techmeme picks up on that.

Maybe you’ve been spending too many years on that high horse of yours Dave to see that more often these days you doing more to prove how much of a donkey’s ass you are instead of the thought leader you once were.

Tweet
Categories: Technology | Tags: Dave Winer, judgmental, pompous
Page 1 of 612345...»Last »
  • Search posts

  • Advertising

  • Post Categories

    • Odds & Ends (600)
    • Opinion (26)
    • Podcasts (319)
    • Social (10)
    • Technology (1614)
    • Video (4)
  • Follow Me…

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail
  • Follow me on Google+

    Steven Hodson
    Add to circles

    In 0 people's circles

    Google+ card by plusdevs

    +i
  • Advertising

  • Recent Posts

    • Lazy OEMs equal crap systems – thanks for nothing
    • Doing the dog paddle to the future
    • Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • If you are using a ghostwriter on Twitter you don’t have a clue about social media
    • Another note about this “real name” nonsense
  • Recent Comments

    • John E. Bredehoft on Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • Top Ten Social Media Articles and Tweets of the Day | Michael Blogs on Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • links for 2011-09-26 | Netweb on Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • Leigh on If you are using a ghostwriter on Twitter you don’t have a clue about social media
    • John E. Bredehoft on Be afraid, very afraid because for some reason someone thinks I am an influencer
    • Be afraid, very afraid because for some reason someone thinks I am an influencer | Shooting at Bubbles on Are you ready for a hot new buzz phrase?
    • Rene on Google+ moron moment – no it won’t replace your blog
    • Brett Nordquist on Google+ moron moment – no it won’t replace your blog
© Shooting at Bubbles. Proudly Powered by WordPress | Nest Theme by YChong