Posts with tag "copyright"
canadian-flag

Canada and its laws under siege from the European Union

For those who follow the whole copyright war that is going on – and trust me it is a war – much of the attention is being centered around the backroom dealings on a global level by those looking to get ACTA accepted as the new law of the land.

At the same time that Canada is being targeted by this group it is also finding itself under attack by the European Union.

You see the EU wants Canada to totally change all its laws when it comes to copyright and intellectual property. Laws that have stood this country in good stead for more than a few decades and have been lauded as some of the fairest in the world. Of course it isn’t the entertainment industry that praises them but rather the actual artists, writers and actors who do the real creating.

So how bad of an effect would this have on our country?

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

The real war for control of technology and the Web

RIAA Age of privacy discussions are pointless when compared to the real war going on.

It isn’t pretty and glamorous to be involved in but its impact will be deeper than any open data argument.

This is a war that crosses national boundaries and yet not a whimper is being heard. This is a war that is subverting national policies but the voices of cyber Paul Reveres are ignored as we play FarmVille. Countries from Canada to New Zealand and Australia to Costa Rica are facing everything from outright economic pressure to underhanded backroom dealings signed away in NDAs.

Under the acronym of ACTA landing boats are bringing lawyers, trade organizations and promises of global ostracization. This is the war that the entertainment industry is doing everything it can to keep under the radar.

Yet this industry is seeking to forever change how we use technology and the Internet. Primary among its weapons is the hijacking of a growing number of countries and their laws surrounding copyrights. Primary among its ways to affects these laws is political pressure by members of political parties who they have been financing for years.

It is those politicians who are threatening the economic viability of countries like Costa Rica using threats of blocking US markets for Costa Rican sugar – unless they agree to radically changing their copyright laws.

Canada is being assaulted on two fronts in a war that wants our country to acquiesce our copyright laws. From the US and ACTA to the European Union and their CETAEU our country is being told to change our laws that have been called some of the fairest copyright laws in the world.

This is a war that if lost will make concerns about privacy seem petty and archaic. It is a war if lost will make Google and China’s little dance seem like pointless. It is a war that lives in the background and has no glamour or cute buzzwords to gain fame with.

It is a war I fear we will lose before we realize that we need to fight. But then we’ll always have things like FarmVille to fall back on eh.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Canada heads to the technological bush league

canadarm We have some of the smartest minds in the world working in all areas of computer technology. We were at one time a leader in broadband penetration and a beacon to countries with our hands off approach to the Internet. That is all changing and it boils down to, in my own personal opinion, to two things – the screwed up implementation of patents and copyright as well as federal government with no guts or foresight.

Already we are hamstrung by copyright laws that force services like Pandora and Hulu to deny us access to their services and why – because a dying entertainment industry is enforcing archaic copyright laws. To this end we have a government that is a major player in the secret backroom deals that are going into the implementation of ACTA – the next generation copyright laws that will apply worldwide.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Blogging and plagiarism

I had a great opportunity the other day to join Jeff Chandler on his Perfcast podcast where he and some extremely knowledgeable folks discussed the what and wherefores of plagiarism and the blogging world. Jeff’s other guests included Jonathan Bailey from the Plagiarism Today blog, Patrick O’Keefe and Dave AC.

It was good to get back into doing a podcast; even if only as a guest, and I couldn’t think of a better person to do it (thanks Jeff). so if you are interested in the subject of plagiarism and how it can related to bloggers grab a coffee and have a listen.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Well Colour Me Unimpressed – Pandora Gets Another Stay

Please don't shoot - yetBefore anyone starts jumping down my throat about how great Pandora is, how bad the RIAA is or how this is all about restoring our rights as consumers let me say this….

Pandora is a great service; and one that the other 95% of the world would love to use as well but that isn’t able to. I; and the rest of the world outside of the US, loved using Pandora up until it was chopped off at the knees by the music industry as they used copyright laws and their royalty system like a chainsaw. Even though this latest call to arms was due to yet another trade association trying to kill off any competition it doesn’t change the fact that this Pandora publicity is only a minor part of a much larger issue.

The actual Webcasters Bill that is being raised above the crowd like some flag of victory doesn’t change anything even it is passed. Take a look at the summary of the actual bill for the short form explanation of what the bill actually does (you can read the whole thing here)

SUMMARY

H.R. 7084 contains technical amendments to the Small Webcasting Settlement Act of 2002 (P.L. 107-321) which will permit commercial and noncommercial webcasters to negotiate royalty rates and terms other than those determined by the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) in its May 2007 decision.  That decision was the basis for legislation introduced last year and is currently subject to a legal challenge at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which has, thus far, upheld the market rates and terms set by the CRB.

The key line here is …which will permit commercial and noncommercial webcasters to negotiate royalty rates. Wow, now US webcasters can negotiate with music labels outside of the US centric royalty structure contolled by the music labels. Well big whoop-di-doo – just because you have been given a right to negotiate doesn’t mean that the bloodsuckers on the other side of the table give a shit about your offers or that they will even come to the table. As with all things to do with the music labels and the RIAA (and now the NAB) they don’t care about what the webcasters want. They only care about how much money they can suck from you even if it means you going bankrupt.

The fact is that webcasters are being held up against the wall with a gun to their heads. They are being forced into a position where they have to pay more in royalties that what they can ever hope to pull in by advertising or subscriptions combined and still make a profit margin. It doesn’t matter if it is a serice like Pandora or a music loving fan streaming their favorite music on the web and not making a cent. Even though Corvida in a post on ReadWriteWeb liken this latest event to being a huge success; which I highly question, she also points out that this is only a stopgap measure

While this is a huge success for web radio broadcasters, it’s not everlasting. The Act will allow web radio broadcasters to negotiate with the music industry only while Congress is out of session. They have until February 15th to settle upon a new royalty rate. While four months may seem like a long time, we understand how much of a hassle the music industry can be to the world of all things digital.

I would suggest that the last sentence is nothing short of a big understatement given that this doesn’t change the fact that the music labels and the RIAA would be just as happy to negotiate webcasters out of existence and royalty rates are their best weapon. Like Paul Glazowski points out over at Mashable

Rates which, in short, are what can either ensure the continued existence of such services or drive many to go belly up just as their collective popularity is increase

In addition this does nothing to address the biggest problem for webcasters in the US – they are being cut off from the rest of the world. They can cut all the royalty deals they want and exist on literally penny profit margins but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still isolated. As a result both the webcasters and the users are being held ransom by the music labels and the RIAA. So remember this while you are all slapping yourselfs on the back over this short lived victory – it doesn’t matter to the rest of the world because nothing has changed.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Are web backup sites legally protected?

Virtual safety deposit boxes For those of you not following this it started when EMI sued MP3Tunes.com for the contents of the online storage that the site offered it users to store their MP3 music files. Well according to a post on TechWag MP3Tunes.com has prevailed in the case which means that some 300 TB of files, users names and other related information is free from the prying eyes of EMI and the RIAA.

The argument that was used was that these online storage sites which are password protected and encrypted are no different than when you walk into a bank and sign up for a safety deposit box

MP3tunes strongly objected to EMI’s request, because it was both an invasion of user’s personal storage, and because it would create a huge technical and financial burden, with more than 300 terabytes of files in personal Lockers. Files are not MP3tunes’ possessions any more than the contents of a safety deposit box are owned by the bank that houses them. The storage provided by MP3tunes is the user’s own space. A Locker is empty when someone opens an account and that customer decides what files are placed into their Locker. All files are stored at the request of the user. People who choose to utilize remote storage should be guaranteed the same level of privacy they have for the files stored on their local hard disk.

This argument apparently worked because the New York judge hearing the case has turned down the request by EMI for MP3Tunes.com to turn over all the information. While this was a nice win to see and even though Michael Robertson’s (owner of MP3Tunes.com) statement that .. “At stake is personal ownership and privacy in the digital era – both issues worth fighting for.” strikes me more of good PR I think the sentiment behind it is valid.

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

From the Pipeline – 4.17.08

With tomorrow being Friday any one placing bets on what this weekend’s bitchmeme will be about because I’m not seeing anything really developing at this point. In the meantime here’s a few things that caught my eye today in my FriendFeed pipeline.

Put a Copyright Notice in Your RSS Feed :: Internet Duct Tape – Eric gives those of us using Feedburner to handle our RSS feeds a simple way to add a copyright notice to them. Thanks!

Andrew Baron: Retarded or Marketing Genius? :: Duncan Riley – Duncan has a few thoughts on the recent attempt by Andrew Baron to sell his Twitter account on eBay.

Scoble the Twittering Machine :: I’m Not A Geek – apparently Robert Scoble has cried uncle on the number of people he is following which it turns out is 20,000+ – ouch.

Adding Intelligence To Search :: A VC – with a bit of self-promotion Fred Wilson shows how one search company is trying to add some intelligence into the mix.

Closely-watched case may spell trouble for software patents :: Ars Technica – this is a slightly older story on FriendFeed that came back to the surface today and it was a comment by Chris White that caught my eye – Wow, this is a really interesting perspective. If software is language, then restricting the use of it is like restricting free speech

Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?

Quick Thoughts for 12.20.07

Someone please put the old guy out of his misery As I get older I find myself dreading this time of the year more and more. Besides the fact it drives up the stress levels it has become more about who can give the biggest and the most expensive presents. Not to mention the fact that every stupid driver in the world seems to have hit the roads and are desperately trying to prove just how stupid they really are.

The Death of Digg (or Why Social Media is Not all What It’s Cracked Up to Be) :: Martin Neumann – glad to see I’m not the only one who thinks social networks as they stand aren’t what they seem .. and definitely nothing to be getting excited over.

Ad Blocking Hypocrites :: O’Flaherty Blog – you go Paul … I’m right behind you on this one.

Who Will Be The First Tech President? Help Us Endorse A Candidate :: TechCrunch – when I first read this my first reaction was that Michael was getting a little full of himself. Then I realized that he was right and I guess if there is anyone who can give this the publicity it needs it will be Mr. Arrington

It’s Time To Wean Ourselves Off An Unhealthy Addiction To Copyright :: Techdirt – Mike Masnick has an interesting post on this whole Hartwell photograph rigmarole that has lit a fire under the tech blogosphere this week.


Hey, like this post? Why not share it with a buddy?