Shooting at Bubbles

taking joy in the popping of the social media bubble & other web 2.0 silliness

  • Home
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • About
Twitter Facebook RSS
Tag Archives: advertising

Paying the bills – WinExtra Style

Posted on December 9, 2006 by Steven Hodson
Comments off

Like most bloggers trying to pay the bills; as far as hosting and other related costs that are a part of trying to be a professional blogger, is something that we have to always find ways that will monetize the writing bug that has taken us full tilt. It doesn’t help that like many out there I’m not part of the A-List so my avenues of producing a revenue stream from advertising is pretty slim – meaning Google AdSense is about the only real method available.

The rest of this post is over at the WinExtra Blog

Tweet
Categories: Odds & Ends | Tags: AdSense, advertising, affiliates, WinExtra

Ethics – The ReviewME Blues

Posted on November 12, 2006 by Steven Hodson
14 Comments

Awhile back I wrote a piece called Does reputation have a sticker price in which I voiced my feelings on the whole pay for post concept that is making its way into the blogsphere. In that piece one of the questions I asked was:

If original content is important to a blogs reputation how valid is that content when you are being paid to post it? What is the difference between being paid via the sidebar ads from ad networks and being paid by an company to write about a product?

I also stated in it that I would not use the reviewME service from Text-Link-Ads.com because I still had some uneasy feelings about the whole business model; but that hasn’t stopped me from following the issue.

In the last week reviewME has gone live; with a $25,000 give-away, bring the whole subject to the forefront again. While it was being commended for avoiding the pitfalls that earned PayPerPost.com derision, the feeling of anyone who used the service was dirtying their hands still remained.

This was quite evident when reading through the comments of Scott Carp’s post on Publishing 2.0 where he provided a living model of a reviewME based post. One of the comments from the ‘net curmudgeon himself Nick Carr basically equated anyone using the service as a pimp:

Would I have written the same post?

You wouldn’t have written the same post because you wouldn’t have mentioned taking money. And because you mentioned taking money, this post will receive much more traffic than the one you would (or might) have written and hence will give your benefactor more publicity. Besides, as Mathew said, the quality of the act doesn’t really matter. It’s the exchange of money that matters.

The real innovation of ReviewMe is that they’ve created a marketplace for buying influence.

Pimping 2.0?

One other commenter was more blunt about it calling people using the service nothing less than prostitutes. There is some pretty strong setiment being expressed around the whole issue but calling bloggers who use the service and disclose it pimps and prositutes I believe is going to an extreme.

Afterall look at the majority of blogs out there who utilize ad networks. Some bloggers use them with discretion while others try and blend in the ads in such away that the reader can’t tell the difference. Who’s being the pimp here and for alot less money.

The A-Listers of the blogsphere seem to think that just because they can command high dollars for ad spots; or get paid nice salaries, that their blogging morality is the only one that counts. Personally I would love not to run ads of any type but this endeavor like most things in life costs money and I do it full time. Should I not receive some sort of compensation for my time?

Advertising is an insidious beast, some types are better than others. Afterall there is a booming market in adblockers just as there is for code to get around them. Personally I really dislike video ads, link ads and splash page type ads. I think they are more intrusive and prosituting than some-one getting paid – with full disclosure – for a review. What is the diference really between a graphic ad in the middle of a post or a post that says in the subject line that it is an Advertorial.

I decided to investigate and see just how much my voice was worth on reviewME and signed up only to find out that given my current ranking I’m worth 20.00USD regardless of whether I write a good or bad review. Now taking the fact that this article has taken approximately an hour to compose and post compared against my AdSense earnings for October and November (to date) of 15.00USD which do you think is the better earner?

I still am not sure about this whole thing as there is something about it that just doesn’t sit right but for some I am sure this will be a valid way for them to see a return on their time investment. The real test I think for the reviewME model is when we actually see negative reviews make it to the blogshere but I wonder if they will see the same discussion as we are having now.

Oh and I did not get paid for this article.

Tweet
Categories: Technology | Tags: advertising, blogs, earning a living, reviewMe

Does reputation have a price sticker?

Posted on October 15, 2006 by Steven Hodson
3 Comments

There has been a discussion going on for some time now as to whether or not it is proper for bloggers and social network members should be paid by either 3rd parties or the owners of the networks.

This first really came to a head when Jason Calacanis over at the revamped Netscape.com raided digg.com for its top posters with what basically amounted to a job offer – come post for us and get paid for your time (you can read more about this here, here, here and here).

This was followed shortly with multiple discussions concerning the paying of bloggers to be nothing more than advertising hacks by companies like PayPerPost.com (here and here) and newcomer reviewME.com; which set to go live within a month – and is owned by Text-Link-Ads.com – Disclaimer: I am currently trying to use their ad service but I will never use this new offering from them.

Then I find out the other day that preCharge Forums; a division of preCharge Risk Management Solutions,  is paying folks to post in their forum network – this came from a close RL friend of mine who is a admin of the forums.

Is this really any different than those of us that try an eek out some extra cash by joining an advertising network and place their ads on our blog pages?

The Netscape model I have no real problem with; after all the A-List bloggers have for the longest time tried to get across the idea that blogging can be a profession equal to that of a reporter for a mainstream media outlet. If this is really the case then why shouldn’t folks that want to earn a living doing this take up Netscape’s offer.

However the Netscape model is primarily trying; from what I can tell anyway, to situate themselves as an authoritative site of news and information within the blogsphere and paying good money to do so.

The problem with that though is that neither Netscape, digg or others like them are originators of original content. They really are no different than the old link exchanges that were all the rage at one time. So paying someone to do nothing more than post links on the hope of bringing in ad revenue from the incoming traffic seems just a little more than stupid; not to mention it lowers the general surfer opinion of what true blogging is.

It would be different if they were producing original content and increasing the value of the blogsphere; not that the blogging world doesn’t have its own problems with sites ripping off content and passing it as their own along with massive blocks of Google AdSense.

If original content is important to a blogs reputation how valid is that content when you are being paid to post it? What is the difference between being paid via the sidebar ads from ad networks and being paid by an company to write about a product?

Some will say nothing really as long as you have a disclaimer stating that the content is really a paid for advertisement – after all the mainstream media has been doing the same thing forever. Not to mention the number of sites out there that craft their AdSense to look like part of a post.

To me there is a big difference; with or without a disclaimer, and it has to do with the integrity and reputation that you want to represent within your blog. After all if you are nothing more than a paid shill what honest value does your opinions bring to the table – none!

With the sidebar ads; that are clearly marked as advertising, you are clearly stating that this is an income producing blog but not to the point that the content is being over shadowed. Sure I would love nothing more than not having to worry about whether the ads are working, or that they are in step with the blog content, or that I’m not over doing it and irritating my reader(s) :) .

But I’m not a rich man; nor am I an A-List blogger who can make a six figure living from writing. I am just a old fart that likes to express his opinion and pass along what I think is interesting news and information. However this does cost money so I am left looking at all my alternatives to try and make a few dollars to cover cost and maybe take the wife out to dinner once in awhile.

The question is though – does my current and future reputation have a price sticker on it?

I would hope not as I know I will never go the route of PayPerPost.com; I would close down first, and as tempting as it might be to take a Netscape job I would get bored before they sent the first paycheck.

So I guess that means you’ll have to put up with sidebar ads and I’ll be able to keep on writing original content for my reader(s) with no-one looking over my shoulder.

There will be no price stickers on my content :)

Tweet
Categories: Technology | Tags: AdSense, advertising, blogging, blogs, digg, Netscape, PayPerPost, reputation, reviewMe
Page 25 of 25« First«...10...2122232425
  • Search posts

  • Advertising

  • Post Categories

    • Odds & Ends (600)
    • Opinion (26)
    • Podcasts (319)
    • Social (10)
    • Technology (1615)
    • Video (4)
  • Follow Me…

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail
  • Follow me on Google+

    Couldn't get data from google+
  • Advertising

  • Recent Posts

    • Lazy OEMs equal crap systems – thanks for nothing
    • Doing the dog paddle to the future
    • Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • If you are using a ghostwriter on Twitter you don’t have a clue about social media
    • Another note about this “real name” nonsense
  • Recent Comments

    • John E. Bredehoft on Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • Top Ten Social Media Articles and Tweets of the Day | Michael Blogs on Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • links for 2011-09-26 | Netweb on Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • Leigh on If you are using a ghostwriter on Twitter you don’t have a clue about social media
    • John E. Bredehoft on Be afraid, very afraid because for some reason someone thinks I am an influencer
    • Be afraid, very afraid because for some reason someone thinks I am an influencer | Shooting at Bubbles on Are you ready for a hot new buzz phrase?
    • Rene on Google+ moron moment – no it won’t replace your blog
    • Brett Nordquist on Google+ moron moment – no it won’t replace your blog
© Shooting at Bubbles. Proudly Powered by WordPress | Nest Theme by YChong