Shooting at Bubbles

taking joy in the popping of the social media bubble & other web 2.0 silliness

  • Home
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • About
Twitter Facebook RSS

Firefox is raping my memory

Posted on November 13, 2008 by Steven Hodson
18 Comments

I realize that just about everyone and their brother in the tech work is all infatuated with Firefox but why this browser gets such a walk when it comes to memory problems is beyond me. I had originally switched to Chrome when it came out because I wasn’t happy with the beta of IE8 (still not) and I never really liked Firefox but recently I decided to give the new beta of Firefox another try.

Even though initially it used more memory than Chrome I continued using through several beta updates even though I did experience problems with it. That was until yesterday though when I finally had enough of the browser deciding that my memory (2Gig) was a three course meal. Within a few seconds of starting up Firefox after rebooting my system this is what Task Manager informed me that Firefox (with 3 tabs loading and no plugins installed) was using this amount of memory


Firefox memory seconds after starting up

After waiting a little bit longer to see if the remaining two tabs would finally load this is what Task Manager informed me Firefox’s memory usage was

Firefox memory before closing it out with Task Manager

Sorry but that just isn’t acceptable.

Related articles by Zemanta

  • Firefox 3.04 is out
  • Chrome and Firefox Browser Betas Duke it Out in Speed Tests
  • Jump from Firefox to any other browser in a flash
  • Chromifox Makes Firefox Look Like Google Chrome [Firefox]
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Tweet
Categories: Odds & Ends | Tags: browsers, chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer 8, Mozilla, Task Manager

About Steven Hodson

View all posts by Steven Hodson→
Some more USB silliness to keep you warm
Kevin Rose Allegedly Guilty of Felony Computer Hacking

18 Responses to “Firefox is raping my memory”

  1. beltzner says:
    November 13, 2008 at 10:57 pm

    Can you give us some more details about what version you're using and what pages you're opening? We run memory usage tests on every build of the browser and haven't seen this happen, but would appreciate your feedback!

  2. beltzner says:
    November 13, 2008 at 10:57 pm

    Can you give us some more details about what version you're using and what pages you're opening? We run memory usage tests on every build of the browser and haven't seen this happen, but would appreciate your feedback!

  3. StevenHodson says:
    November 13, 2008 at 11:15 pm

    k here's the rundown since it's pretty simple

    OS: Vista SP1
    Firefox: 3.0.4
    Plugins: 0
    # of tabs set to open: 3

    Now … I'm not sure as I can't really test this but I don't recall having this bad of a problem before installing the upgrade to the newest version of Flash that recently was released via auto update. However none of the pages set to load use Flash as far as I know. So that could be a wild goose chase but felt worthwhile mentioning just in case.

  4. StevenHodson says:
    November 13, 2008 at 11:15 pm

    k here's the rundown since it's pretty simple

    OS: Vista SP1
    Firefox: 3.0.4
    Plugins: 0
    # of tabs set to open: 3

    Now … I'm not sure as I can't really test this but I don't recall having this bad of a problem before installing the upgrade to the newest version of Flash that recently was released via auto update. However none of the pages set to load use Flash as far as I know. So that could be a wild goose chase but felt worthwhile mentioning just in case.

  5. StevenHodson says:
    November 13, 2008 at 11:15 pm

    k here's the rundown since it's pretty simple

    OS: Vista SP1
    Firefox: 3.0.4
    Plugins: 0
    # of tabs set to open: 3

    Now … I'm not sure as I can't really test this but I don't recall having this bad of a problem before installing the upgrade to the newest version of Flash that recently was released via auto update. However none of the pages set to load use Flash as far as I know. So that could be a wild goose chase but felt worthwhile mentioning just in case.

  6. Surprise! The memory issues are back in Firefox says:
    November 14, 2008 at 1:00 am

    [...] I number of users said they weren’t having issues, although the difference seems to be that the issue may be related primarily to the Mac version, although Inquisitr columnist Steve Hodson who doesn’t own a Mac has the same problem as well: details here on Winextra. [...]

  7. robdiana says:
    November 14, 2008 at 4:31 am

    Steven,

    I admit that Firefox is a memory hog generally speaking, but I have never seen that type of memory usage before. On my setup, I have several plugins (webdev, StumbleUpon, Delicious, ReadItLater and several others) and I normally open over 100 tabs in a day. My memory consumption has never gone above 500MB. I am not saying 500MB is good, they do not reclaim memory allocated for tabs very well, but I think there may be a problem in your setup. Definitely work with those guys to see what the problem is.

  8. robdiana says:
    November 14, 2008 at 4:31 am

    Steven,

    I admit that Firefox is a memory hog generally speaking, but I have never seen that type of memory usage before. On my setup, I have several plugins (webdev, StumbleUpon, Delicious, ReadItLater and several others) and I normally open over 100 tabs in a day. My memory consumption has never gone above 500MB. I am not saying 500MB is good, they do not reclaim memory allocated for tabs very well, but I think there may be a problem in your setup. Definitely work with those guys to see what the problem is.

  9. robdiana says:
    November 14, 2008 at 4:31 am

    Steven,

    I admit that Firefox is a memory hog generally speaking, but I have never seen that type of memory usage before. On my setup, I have several plugins (webdev, StumbleUpon, Delicious, ReadItLater and several others) and I normally open over 100 tabs in a day. My memory consumption has never gone above 500MB. I am not saying 500MB is good, they do not reclaim memory allocated for tabs very well, but I think there may be a problem in your setup. Definitely work with those guys to see what the problem is.

  10. StevenHodson says:
    November 15, 2008 at 10:33 am

    I even tried rolling back the flash plugin to v9.0 but with no luck at all. The browser still locks up with on tab loaded and the first two tabs stuck in a loop and ramping the CPU to 100% and eating up memory like it is going out of style.

    The only thing I can think of left to try is to uninstall this build clean out the systems of anything to do with FF and reinstall a new copy. Any suggestions as to what build to try (no plugins used) will be welcome.

  11. StevenHodson says:
    November 15, 2008 at 10:33 am

    I even tried rolling back the flash plugin to v9.0 but with no luck at all. The browser still locks up with on tab loaded and the first two tabs stuck in a loop and ramping the CPU to 100% and eating up memory like it is going out of style.

    The only thing I can think of left to try is to uninstall this build clean out the systems of anything to do with FF and reinstall a new copy. Any suggestions as to what build to try (no plugins used) will be welcome.

  12. StevenHodson says:
    November 15, 2008 at 10:33 am

    I even tried rolling back the flash plugin to v9.0 but with no luck at all. The browser still locks up with on tab loaded and the first two tabs stuck in a loop and ramping the CPU to 100% and eating up memory like it is going out of style.

    The only thing I can think of left to try is to uninstall this build clean out the systems of anything to do with FF and reinstall a new copy. Any suggestions as to what build to try (no plugins used) will be welcome.

  13. joemontana says:
    November 16, 2008 at 11:11 am

    odd, I'm running FF 3.0.4 here, with 7 tabs open, as well as running some graphics conversion stuff, FF isn't using all that much memory.

    Joe

  14. joemontana says:
    November 16, 2008 at 11:11 am

    odd, I'm running FF 3.0.4 here, with 7 tabs open, as well as running some graphics conversion stuff, FF isn't using all that much memory.

    Joe

  15. joemontana says:
    November 16, 2008 at 11:11 am

    odd, I'm running FF 3.0.4 here, with 7 tabs open, as well as running some graphics conversion stuff, FF isn't using all that much memory.

    Joe

  16. rawr says:
    November 28, 2008 at 11:59 am

    What else are you going to use your memory for? If it's high, you're browsing the internet, if you have tabs open, they're using memory. Would you prefer to redownload all of the pages/images/etc that are most likely going to remain static between downloads? Where else is it going to store all of the images it downloads besides in memory? In space?

    I have 15 tabs open (with sites like GMail) and 20 add-ons installed. Firefox is using only 312MB of ram. :)

  17. rawr says:
    November 28, 2008 at 11:59 am

    What else are you going to use your memory for? If it's high, you're browsing the internet, if you have tabs open, they're using memory. Would you prefer to redownload all of the pages/images/etc that are most likely going to remain static between downloads? Where else is it going to store all of the images it downloads besides in memory? In space?

    I have 15 tabs open (with sites like GMail) and 20 add-ons installed. Firefox is using only 312MB of ram. :)

  18. rawr says:
    November 28, 2008 at 11:59 am

    What else are you going to use your memory for? If it's high, you're browsing the internet, if you have tabs open, they're using memory. Would you prefer to redownload all of the pages/images/etc that are most likely going to remain static between downloads? Where else is it going to store all of the images it downloads besides in memory? In space?

    I have 15 tabs open (with sites like GMail) and 20 add-ons installed. Firefox is using only 312MB of ram. :)

Page 1 of 11
  • Search posts

  • Advertising

  • Post Categories

    • Odds & Ends (600)
    • Opinion (26)
    • Podcasts (319)
    • Social (10)
    • Technology (1615)
    • Video (4)
  • Follow Me…

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSSFollow Us on E-mail
  • Follow me on Google+

    Couldn't get data from google+
  • Advertising

  • Recent Posts

    • Lazy OEMs equal crap systems – thanks for nothing
    • Doing the dog paddle to the future
    • Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • If you are using a ghostwriter on Twitter you don’t have a clue about social media
    • Another note about this “real name” nonsense
  • Recent Comments

    • John E. Bredehoft on Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • Top Ten Social Media Articles and Tweets of the Day | Michael Blogs on Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • links for 2011-09-26 | Netweb on Our red/blue Facebook pill moment has arrived
    • Leigh on If you are using a ghostwriter on Twitter you don’t have a clue about social media
    • John E. Bredehoft on Be afraid, very afraid because for some reason someone thinks I am an influencer
    • Be afraid, very afraid because for some reason someone thinks I am an influencer | Shooting at Bubbles on Are you ready for a hot new buzz phrase?
    • Rene on Google+ moron moment – no it won’t replace your blog
    • Brett Nordquist on Google+ moron moment – no it won’t replace your blog
© Shooting at Bubbles. Proudly Powered by WordPress | Nest Theme by YChong